Double Perfection Lumiere Long-Wear Flawless Sunscreen Powder Makeup Broad Spectrum SPF 15
Last Updated:12.17.2014
Jar Packaging:No
Tested on animals:Yes
Review Overview

Chanel describes this pricey, fragrance-free powder foundation as "the perfect balance between softness, radiance, and a matte finish," and they're right! This is an excellent option for those with normal to dry skin who want an easy-to-apply, compact powder foundation that feels wonderfully soft and smooth while providing sheer to light coverage.

Although this sounds contradictory, the finish is best described as "radiant matte." You get a healthy, non-sparkling glow that looks like skin, not power, yet it feels matte. On balance, this foundation's finish isn't the best for combination or oily skin, unless you don't mind the extra sheen that will occur over the oily areas.

Broad-spectrum sun protection is provided from pure titanium dioxide, though unless you're really going to pile this on (which we don't recommend), you'll want to apply it over a moisturizer rated SPF 15 or greater. Any SPF-rated product must be applied liberally to get the stated level of protection, and most people are unlikely to apply enough powder to get sufficient protection (because doing so means a heavy application of powder).

The shade range is beautiful—there's not a bad one in the bunch! Even the colors that appear pink or peachy in the compact go on more neutral than you'd think, which is great. The darkest colors aren't very dark, but they don't look ashen, either. Those with fair (but not very fair) to tan skin will fare best here.

  • Provides broad-spectrum sun protection when applied liberally.
  • Beautifully smooth texture and seamless application.
  • Natural-looking coverage.
  • Gorgeous, skin-like finish doesn't look dry or powdery.
  • Flawless shade range for fair to tan skin tones.
  • Fragrance-free.
  • Pricey (you can find equally good powder foundations for less).

Active Ingredient: Titanium Dioxide 3.8%; Inactive Ingredients: Talc, Boron Nitride, Dimethicone, Silica, Octyldodecyl Lactate, Caprylyl Methicone, Cetearyl Ethylhexanoate, Isopropyl Isostearate, Lauryl Lactate, Zinc Stearate, Methylparaben, Polyisoprene, Zinc Oxide, Propylparaben, Bis-Hydroxyethoxypropyl Dimethicone/IPDI Copolymer Ethylcarbamate, Pentaerythrityl Tetra Di-T-Butyl Hydroxyhydrocinnamate. May Contain: Red 6, Red 7 Lake, Yellow 5 Lake, Ultramarines, Iron Oxides, Titanium Dioxide, Mica.

Brand Overview

Chanel At-A-Glance

Strengths: Hmmmm… sleek and occasionally elegant packaging; the sunscreens provide broad-spectrum protection; a handful of good cleansers and a topical scrub; some impressive foundations with sunscreen; an assortment of good makeup products including concealer, blush, mascara, eyeshadow and bronzer.

Weaknesses: Expensive, with an emphasis on style over substance; overpriced; overreliance on jar packaging; antioxidants in most products amount to a mere dusting; no products to successfully address sun- or hormone-induced skin discolorations with research-proven ingredients; mostly mediocre to poor eye pencils; extremely limited options for eyeshadows if you want a matte finish.

The history of this Paris-bred line is steeped in fashion, jewelry, and fragrance firsts. The image-is-everything fashion sensibility and fragrance know-how have been loosely translated to Chanel’s ever-imposing skin-care collection, now divided into several categories, although most of them have overlapping, overly exaggerated claims and over-the-top pricing. The company likes to mention its research facility, referred to as C.E.R.I.E.S. (Centre de Recherches et d'Investigations Epidermiques et Sensorielles) as a way to give credibility to its products and the formulary expertise of Chanel's team of scientists, but its studies are not necessarily the kind of independent research that shows up in medical journals.

Founded in 1991 and funded by Chanel, the goal of this research facility is "to help provide a scientific foundation for the design of skin care products and to promote public awareness of the principles underlying maintenance of healthy, attractive skin." Examining Chanel's often lengthy ingredient lists reveals that they believe healthy, attractive skin requires mostly standard, banal ingredients coupled with lots of fragrance and just a smattering of anything resembling state-of-the-art ingredients. Designing skin-care products whose purpose is to reinforce healthy skin doesn't involve strong scents, irritants such as alcohol, or sunscreens whose SPF ratings fall below the standards set by major health organizations, including the American Academy of Dermatology and corresponding international academies as well. Furthermore, their Nº 1 products claim to increase skin's oxygen uptake, something that essentially puts skin on the fast track for more free-radical damage, and no one at C.E.R.I.E.S. seems to have any idea about how to treat acne-prone skin. (Well, let's face it, acne is never fashionable.)

Just like most Chanel skin-care products, the research facility and its ties to the dermatology community make it sound more impressive than it really is. Chanel's influence on fashion and luxury accoutrements is legendary and ongoing; but their skin-care products simply cannot compete with what many other lines are doing, including Estee Lauder, Clinique, Prescriptives, Olay, Dove, Neutrogena, and many others. Considering the couture-level prices, too much of Chanel's skin care is average, and that doesn't look good on anyone.

For more information about Chanel, call (800) 550-0005 or visit www.chanel.com.

Chanel Makeup

Chanel pulls out all the stops to present their makeup in the most flattering light. Many of their products are deserving of the best status, but, frustratingly, an equal number disappoint, seeming to coast on Chanel's name and attention to upscale, designer-influenced packaging rather than providing true quality. For example, few companies have foundations with textures as varied and state-of-the-art as Chanel. However, most of their foundations with sunscreen are formulated without essential UVA-protecting ingredients, even though Chanel clearly knows about this issue, as evidenced from their numerous skin-care products that do contain avobenzone or titanium dioxide. Neglecting adequate UVA protection while going on about how the product creates younger-looking skin is not only inaccurate, it's harmful to your skin's health and appearance.

Beyond inadequate sunscreen, Chanel's eye and lip pencils have extraordinary prices, but ordinary to poor performance, and most of their "we're trying to be unique and clever" products don't do much to prove they're worthy of purchase. It's hard to ignore that much of what Chanel does well other lines do just as well (and sometimes better), and with a more realistic price range to boot. However, the overall situation is better than standard but well-dressed formulas with shamelessly affluent prices, because although it's not inexpensive, the best of Chanel's makeup is truly outstanding. What's needed to establish consistency is an overhaul of the many products that have fallen behind formula-wise. We doubt Chanel will reevaluate their pricing for the better, but given that, the least you should expect is stellar performance from everything you buy that bears the iconic double C logo!

Note: Chanel is categorized as a brand that tests on animals because its products are sold in China. Although Chanel does not conduct animal testing for its products sold elsewhere, the Chinese government requires imported cosmetics be tested on animals, so foreign companies retailing there must comply. This requirement is why some brands state that they don’t test on animals “unless required by law.” Animal rights organizations consider cosmetic companies retailed in China to be brands that test on animals, and so does the Paula’s Choice Research Team.

About the Experts

The new Beautypedia Team proudly and unequivocally maintains the commitment to help you find the best products possible for your skin. We do this by relentlessly pursuing and relying on published scientific research so you will have unbiased information on what works and what doesn't-and the sneaky ways you could be making your skin worse, not better!

The Beautypedia Team reviews all products using the same research, criteria, and objectivity, whether the product being reviewed is from Paula's Choice or another brand.

Member Comments
Summary of Member Comments
Sort by:
Awesome Powder Foundation

After trying so many powder foundations, I finally found my match. I was on the hunt for so long after Nars discontinued their powder foundation which I loved! This is not cakey and it is long-wearing. My skin has been a little dry since I started using Retin-A a couple of months ago so it was difficult to find a powder foundation that was not drying. Though I use a sunscreen during the day, I love that this has an SPF in it as well. My powder foundation hunt is finally over.

Reviewed by
Eva, M.
Too bad the price is so ridiculous...

This is a great powder with SPF. I like touching up my makeup during the day with a good powder with SPF. I used this one up within a month. The results are similar to Paula's powder with SPF; however, Chanel's color range is much better. Too bad it's so crazy expensive!! Even though I am not on a tight budged I cannot see spending almost $60 a month (that's what it cost me with tax) on a relatively basic powder. I'd rather skip this powder and buy a Chanel bag with the money I save!!

Reviewed by
Aneta D.
Enter a title for your review
First Name, Last Initial
Email Address
How would you rate this product on the following:
500 characters left

Terms of Use

585623-IIS1 v1.0.0.431 10/13/2015 1:40:40 PM