As Clinique's most expensive product (shockingly expensive!), you're most likely to find it at high-end department stores such as Neiman Marcus in the United States and Harrod's in the United Kingdom. Don't worry, you're not missing out on something special, because this is a resounding thumbs-down, overpriced skin-care product.
What you get is six individual teeny bottles, each with two compartments. The top portion of the bottle houses pure vitamin C (ascorbic acid) in powder form. Before you apply the treatment, you're supposed to push the button on the bottle's cap to dispense the vitamin C into the liquid solution in the bottle. Then you shake it to mix and use the dropper to dispense the serum for application.
That's all very clinical-looking and the price may make you think you're getting an extraordinary anti-aging product, but (and this is somewhat surprising for Clinique) the formula has significant weaknesses. Chief among them is the amount of alcohol in this serum. Alcohol causes dryness, free-radical damage, and irritation that hurts your skin's ability to generate healthy collagen and repair itself. All the vitamin C in the world won't make up for a skin-care product that contains this much alcohol.
Speaking of vitamin C, although you're getting a potent amount of it in this product, the ascorbic acid itself can be irritating, especially when mixed with alcohol and the numerous fragrant plant extracts in this formula.
It's disappointing that beyond the vitamin C, the most intriguing ingredients are present only in tiny amounts, while the problematic ingredients are prominent. In short, this "treatment" isn't one you should seek out. Those looking to experience the benefits of vitamin C can do so for a lot less money with serums from Paula's Choice, SkinCeuticals, or Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare. All of these brands offer anti-aging products with a cocktail of beneficial ingredients (including vitamin C) that can help your skin look and act younger.
High potency treatment helps restore brightness to time-tarnished skin. Helps skin boost natural collagen for a firmer, more even skin tone. Gets its strength for a freshly mixed burst of Vitamin C and Purified Mushroom Ferment. Goes on to help visibly reduce the length and depth of lines and wrinkles, recapture a luminous look. Given the potency of the product, it is normal to experience a temporary tingling sensation.
Water, Ascorbic Acid. Alcohol Denatured, Dimethicone, Silica, Squalane, Yeast Extract, Zizyphus Jujuba Extract, Rosa Roxburghi Fruit Extract, Citrus Unshiu Peel Extract, Porphyra Yezoensis (Algae) Extract, Centella Asiatica (Hydrocotyl) Extract, Angelica Acutiloba (Japanese Angelica) Root Extract, Safflower Flower Extract, Peony Root Extract, Hydrolyzed Yeast Protein, Peony Root Extract, Soybean Seed Extract, Rice Bran Extract, Dipropylene Glycol, St. Paul’s Wort Extract, Saccharomyces Lysate Extract, Acetyl Glucosamine, Poria Cocos Sclerotium Extract, Trametes Versicolor Extract, Gardenia Florida Extract, Black Strap Molassas, Creatine, Bifida Ferment Lysate, Adenosine Phosphate, Glucose, Palmitoyl Oligopeptide, Acetyl Hexapeptide, 8-Acetyl Carnitine Hcl, Glycosaminoglycans, Glycerin, Betaine, Sucrose, Bis-Peg-18 Methyl Ether Dimethyl Silane, Peg-8 Dimethicone, Caffeine, Glyceryl Polymethacrylate, Tromethamine, Alcaligenes Polysaccharide, Sodium RNA, Butylene Glycol, Peg-8, Tocopheryl Acetate, Xanthan Gum, Carbomer, Disodium Edta, Potassium Sorbate, Phenoxyethanol Note: I thoroughly examined the packaging for this product (and spoke with the Clinique representative) and nowhere does it indicate how much product is in each vial, only that each vial should last one week. The packaging is a frosted glass dropper vial, with ascorbic acid powder sealed in a separate chamber that’s released into the vial when opened.
Clinique was Estee Lauder's first attempt to expand its market with a completely separate line and image. Shortly after its 1968 debut at U.S. cosmetics counters, Clinique became known as the indispensable line for the woman under 30 concerned with breakouts, oily skin, and fragrance-free products (meaning less likely to cause allergic or sensitizing skin reactions). That's likely just what Lauder execs had in mind, because their namesake line's image and positioning was geared more toward the mature woman.
Clinique's tremendous success (the company's products are sold in over 13,000 department stores and in 110 countries) reshaped the way cosmetics lines identified themselves, sending the concept of line loyalty out to pasture. Today, cosmetics companies expand their market either by buying already established companies or by creating new ones, and Lauder has been adept at doing both. Of course, cosmetics companies keep this multiple-personality identity hidden from the consumer. If the general buying public realized that these apparently different companies were so intertwined with each other, how could they flaunt their independence and claim that their unparalleled formulations are secret or the best? It's hard to think Lauder (or any company) would, even if they could, keep secrets from one branch separate from the others. And as evidneced by the formulary similarities between brands, they don't!
The niche Clinique built launched the concept of cosmetics being "allergy-tested," "hypoallergenic," "100% fragrance-free," and "dermatologist tested." Of those marketing claims the only one with significance is "100% fragrance-free," which, for the most part, Clinique maintains (although it does have some fragrant extracts in a few products). Regarding allergy testing, unless you can see the results, what difference does it make if a product makes that claim? What if the test showed 20% of the women who used it had a sensitizing reaction, dryness, or irritation? Would Clinique highlight this, or is it just easier to default to the generic allergy-tested claim and leave such details out? The answer as to which option is easier is clear. Moreover, "hypoallergenic" is a term not regulated by the FDA, so any product can use the word without having to substantiate the claim. "Dermatologist tested" is also bogus, because without published test results the term can easily mean nothing more than that a dermatologist picked up the product, looked at the container, and said "This looks good." And what about the dermatologists on Clinique's payroll? How do we know they're not the ones involved in testing, rather than sending the products out for independent, impartial evaluation (though how impartial can any study be that's paid for by the company making the product)?
Clinique declined any participation in my book or for this site, which included refusing to send us copies of the allergy studies they maintain have been performed for every product they sell. I find their unwillingness to help odd because, for the most part, I genuinely like most of their products. In fact, more than any other department-store line except Estee Lauder, Clinique is leading the way with cutting-edge, state-of-the-art moisturizers and serums. They have their act together for sunscreens and have expanded their decades-old three-step skin-care routine to include water-soluble cleansers instead of bar soap. They also now have a second "Dramatically Different" moisturizer that's well-suited for those with normal to oily skin.
The Clinique consultants, dressed in medical-looking white lab coats (Clinique's image in that sense was ahead of the times given today's plethora of doctor-designed skin-care lines), do their best to speak intelligently about skin-care routines, but for the most part they're trained to sell the products rather than to provide information about what substantiated research has shown about the skin's needs to look and feel its best. The good news for you is that the chemists behind Clinique's arsenal of products have been keeping up on this exciting information, and formulating superior products in response. I wouldn't blindly and solely bank on Clinique as your skin-care solution, but more than ever what they offer is, despite some far-out claims and problematic products, what epitomizes advanced skin care for all ages. Shop carefully and you'll leave confident that you are purchasing products with solid science, not just marketing hype, behind them.
In late 2008 Clinique joined forces with pharmaceutical company Allergan to launch a subset of products labeled as Clinique Medical. These products are sold only at doctor's offices, and are positioned as being scientically-designed to complement those looking for the best skin care after undergoing cosmetic corrective procedures. As expected, despite the link with Allergan and the exclusive-to-doctors retail channel, there isn't anything vastly different about Clinique Medical compared to the regular Clinique line. And the whole marketing angle is just bizarre when you consider that since Clinique's inception they've tied their claims and formulas to the expertise of their "guiding dermatologists". They're selling Clinique Medical as "best in class" skin care diminshes the regard which the company should be holding for several of their other state-of-the-art products (those rated Paula's Pick qualify as such). Needless to say, most of the Clinique Medical products are recommended, but don't think for a second that they're superior to or more professional than the best of Clinique's main line. All Clinique products are fragrance-free unless noted otherwise.
Note: Clinique is categorized as one that tests on animals because their products are sold in China. Although Clinique does not conduct animal testing for their products sold elsewhere, the Chinese government requires imported cosmetics be tested on animals, so foreign companies retailing there must comply. This requirement is why some brand’s state that they don’t test on animals “unless required by law”. Animal rights organizations consider cosmetic companies retailed in China to be brands that test on animals, and so does the Paula’s Choice Research Team.
For more information about Clinique, owned by Estee Lauder, call (800) 419-4041 or visit www.clinique.com.
Clinique continues to offer a vast palette of colors and textures, especially in their huge and imposing selection of foundations, many of which feature effective sunscreens. That single category has become the most compelling reason to shop Clinique's makeup collection. Without a doubt the numerous formulas offer something for every skin type and almost every skin color. The shade selection has improved considerably, with more neutrals and a broader range than ever before. You still need to use caution and watch out for peach-toned duds, but for the most part finding a natural-looking match shouldn't be a frustrating experience, and the counter personnel are happy to provide samples. Although the foundation and powder shades take darker skin tones into account, the blush, eye pencil, and most of the lipstick shades do not. Perhaps that will change in the future, as Clinique beautifully updated their eyeshadow collection with ultra-smooth textures and deeper colors that show up on darker skin.
Compliments are also due for Clinique's updated makeup tester units. They are well-organized, labeled with product name and price, and easily accessible without a salesperson's help. And speaking of salespeople, most of the Clinique consultants I encountered went above and beyond to provide assistance and to answer any questions I had. Those white lab coats don't mean medical expertise, but I'll take outstanding customer service over pseudoscience any day!
The bottom line is that, despite a few shortcomings, Clinique is one of the most comprehensive (and comparably affordable) department-store makeup lines, and it is completely understandable why they enjoy such broad appeal.