Spa-centric Darphin is owned by Estee Lauder. Some time ago, Clinique, another Lauder-owned brand, launched one of their most popular products: Even Better Clinical Dark Spot Corrector. Knowing that, it may not surprise you that Melaperfect Anti-Dark Spots Perfecting Treatment is nearly identical to the Clinique product, but this one costs nearly twice as much!
This re-positioning of products among the different brands owned by the same parent company is something we've seen time and again over the years; L'Oreal does it quite a bit with their Lancome and Kiehl's brands, and Procter & Gamble does it with their Olay and DDF brands. Sometimes the price differences are huge, sometimes comparable—but the products are, more often than not, strikingly similar.
Is there any reason to spend more for Darphin's version of Clinique Even Better Clinical Dark Spot Corrector? No. If you're curious to see what the skin-lightening ingredients in these products can do for your dark spots, Clinique's version is the way to go (though it's not the only skin-lightening option out there). The only significant difference is the fragrance you get from Darphin's version, which is not a plus because fragrance can be a skin irritant. So why spend more for equivalent results and put your skin at risk of irritation?
- Contains an intriguing mix of ingredients that may lighten dark spots.
- Lightweight, silky texture.
- Overpriced, especially given its similarities to Clinique's Even Better Clinical product.
- Contains fragrance ingredients that pose a risk of irritation.
Water\Aqua\Eau, Dimethicone, Isododecane, Cyclopentasiloxane, Polysilicone-11, Butylene Glycol, Ascorbyl Glucoside, PEG-10 Dimethicone, Trametes Versicolor Extract, Sodium RNA, Curcuma Longa (Turmeric) Root Extract, Saccharomyces Lysate Extract, Gentiana Lutea (Gentian) Root Extract, Betula Alba (Birch) Bark Extract, Oryza Sativa (Rice) Bran Extract, Citrus Grandis (Grapefruit) Peel Extract, Salicylic Acid, Dimethoxytolyl Propylresorcinol, Triticum Vulgare (Wheat) Germ Extract, Scutellaria Baicalensis Root Extract, Hordeum Vulgare (Barley) Extract, Cucumis Sativus (Cucumber) Fruit Extract, Hydrolyzed Rice Bran Extract, Ammonium Acryloyldimethyltaurate/VP Copolymer, Morus Bombycis (Mulberry) Root Extract, Cholesterol, Caffeine, Yeast Extract, Glycyrrhetinic Acid, Polysorbate 20, Isohexadecane, Propylene Glycol Dicaprate, Helianthus Annuus (Sunflower) Seedcake, Polysorbate 80, PEG-6, Sodium Hyaluronate, Tromethamine, Di-C12-18 Alkyl Dimonium Chloride, Acetyl Glucosamine, Squalane, Tocopheryl Acetate, Sodium Sulfite, Sodium Metabisulfite, Acrylamide/Sodium Acryloyldimethyltaurate Copolymer, Fragrance (Parfum), Caprylyl Glycol, Hexylene Glycol, Sodium Hydroxide, Disodium EDTA, Phenoxyethanol, Potassium Sorbate, Alpha-Isomethyl Ionone, Linalool, Citral, Limonene, Yellow 6, Yellow 5.
Darphin Paris At-A-Glance
Strengths: Lauder's influence on this line has resulted in only a few improved products; there are some good cleansers; some worthwhile serums and moisturizers; a couple worthwhile masks and a good skin-lightening product that's remarkably similar to a less expensive option from Clinique (another Lauder-owned brand).
Weaknesses: Very expensive; no effective products to address acne or other types of breakouts; pervasive use of skin-irritating fragrant oils; only one sunscreen and it has problems; jar packaging for products that contain air- and light-sensitive ingredients.
From its beginnings as a spa line developed for French aestheticians in the late 1950s, Darphin's core belief is that beauty comes from inner balance and harmony of the body, mind, and soul. This vision was truly new decades ago, and while it sounds great as an image-enhancing philosophy, it never translated, either back then or now, into progressive products that will make a significant difference in the appearance of your skin. In fact, among all of the skin-care lines espousing natural ingredients and botanical extracts, Darphin is the least impressive, with inadequate, dated formulations. Close competitor (and forerunner) Clarins at least includes several daytime moisturizers with sunscreen and also offers a complete collection of sunscreens for the body. Not so with Darphin, whose sunscreen selection is limited at best. Apparently, inner balance involves putting your skin at risk for wrinkles, discolorations, sagging, and, potentially, cancer.
Estee Lauder acquired Darphin in 2003, but that investment has resulted in little improvement or change to this line, options that are desperately needed. Almost without exception, Darphin products are vastly overpriced for what you get. Many of them contain problematic ingredients or plants whose benefit for skin is unknown or merely anecdotal.
As you might expect, most of the anti-aging claims Darphin makes for its products stem from the exotic to commonplace plants and plant extracts they contain. Although it's appealing to think that familiar substances such as ginseng, sandalwood, and corn can firm skin and improve the signs of aging, they do no such thing. Adhering to Darphin's skin-care routines (all of which involve multiple products, most with redundant formulas) would leave skin vulnerable to sun damage, and the many fragrance components found in products throughout the line increase the chance that skin will suffer a phototoxic reaction when exposed to sunlight. Considering the premium prices of these products, that's a lot of potential for a literal and figurative burn!
For more information about Darphin Paris, owned by Estee Lauder, call (866) 880-4559 or visit www.darphhin.com.