Tested on animals:No
Packaged in a tube with a dropper-tip, Ultrasmoothing Eye Serum is an anti-aging miss. Despite the fact this promises to "encourage collagen-producing activities", it contains quite a mix of irritating ingredients—namely witch hazel water (hamamelis virginiana), ginger extract (zingiber officinale), carrot extract (daucus carota), eucalyptus oil, and two forms of lavender oil. All of these are decidedly pro- not anti-aging! See More Info for the details on why these ingredients are such a problem in skin care.
Before we go on, it's worth noting that you may not even need a separate product for your eye area, which we discuss in detail in the More Info section.
What of Dermalogica's claim that they included an "advanced peptide" in this product? This "advanced peptide" is hexapeptide-11, a rather unusual choice given the lack of research demonstrating its effectiveness—and it certainly doesn't compare to longstanding (and proven) ingredients like vitamin C, retinol and other antioxidants or cell-communicating ingredients.
In short, hexapeptide-11 may sound flashy and interesting, but the substance just isn't there to warrant the claims made around it in products like this one.
If you are in the market for a product labelled for your eye area, the Ultrasmoothing Eye Serum is one you can skip (your skin will thank you) in lieu of the numerous alternatives in the Best Eye Moisturizers & Treatments section. Each product recommended contains a spectrum of beneficial anti-aging ingredients, along with formulas that are free of needless irritants. But before you check that list, see the More Info section to learn why you may not need a special product for the eye area.
- Aside from the smattering of antioxidants present, there aren't any pros to speak of.
- Contains numerous irritating ingredients (witch hazel water, ginger and fragrant oils to name a few) that could be considered "pro-aging".
- Lavender and eucalyptus oils make this especially problematic for use in the eye area.
- Expensive given the problematic formula and lack of research surrounding hexapeptid-11.
Why You May Not Need an Eye Serum: Most eye serums aren't necessary. That's either because they are poorly formulated, contain nothing special for the eye area, or come in packaging that won't keep key ingredients stable. Just because the product is labeled as an eye serum doesn't mean it's good for your eye area; in fact, many can actually make matters worse, as is the case for this one.
There is much you can do to improve signs of aging around your eyes. Any product loaded with antioxidants, skin-repairing ingredients, skin-lightening ingredients, anti-inflammatory ingredients, and effective emollients will work wonders and those ingredients don't have to come from a product labeled as an eye serum or eye cream. You would be shocked how many eye-area products lack even the most basic ingredients to help skin. For example, most eye creams don't contain sunscreen. During the day that is a serious problem because it leaves the skin around your eyes vulnerable to sun damage and this absolutely will make dark circles, puffiness, and wrinkles worse!
Whatever product you put around your eye area, regardless of what it is labeled, must be well formulated and appropriate for the skin type around your eyes! That may mean you need an eye cream, but you may also do just as well applying your regular facial moisturizer around your eyes.
Irritation from Fragrance and Fragrant Oils: Daily use of products that contain a high amount of fragrance, whether the fragrant ingredients are synthetic or natural, causes chronic irritation that can damage healthy collagen production, lead to or worsen dryness, and impair your skin's ability to heal. Fragrance-free is the best way to go for all skin types. If fragrance in your skin-care products is important to you, it should be a very low amount to minimize the risk to your skin (Sources: Inflammation Research, December 2008, pages 558–563; Skin Pharmacology and Physiology, June 2008, pages 124–135, and November-December 2000, pages 358–371; Journal of Investigative Dermatology, April 2008, pages 15–19; Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, March 2008, pages 78–82; Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, January 2007, pages 92–105; and British Journal of Dermatology, December 2005, pages S13–S22).