Skin Renew Anti-Puff Eye Roller
0.5 fl. oz. for $13.49
Last Updated:03.12.2015
Jar Packaging:No
Tested on animals:Yes
Review Overview

The best part of this product is the metal roller-ball applicator, which glides along the curvature of the undereye area with ease, depositing a thin layer of water-based liquid. The two ingredients associated with reducing puffiness and dark circles are escin (a component of horse chestnut), due to its circulation-stimulating abilities, and caffeine, due to its constricting abilities. Regrettably, neither ingredient’s association with reducing puffy eyes has any solid research to support the claim, although both are notable antioxidants (Source: www.naturaldatabase.com). This does have a temporary smoothing and tightening effect on skin, but not to the extent that puffy eyes will be visibly deflated. The mica casts a slight shimmer on skin, which reflects light away from dark circles, but a concealer would work much better.

For some reason, Garnier saw fit to reformulate this “eye roller” product and the current formula adds irritants like alcohol and peppermint extract to the mix. Neither are good for skin, but especially the more sensitive skin around the eyes, so this product is one we no longer recommend.


Roll away under-eye puffiness and dark circles for brighter, more radiant eyes.


Aqua/Water, Glycerin, Alcohol Denat., Dimethicone, Caffeine, Acrylates/C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate Crosspolymer, Ascorbyl Glucoside, Caprylyl Glycol, Carbomer, CI 77891/Titanium Dioxide, Dimethiconol, Escin, Mentha Piperta Extract/Peppermint Leaf Extract, Mica, PEG/PPG-18/18 Dimethicone, Phenoxyethanol, Salycylic Acid, Sodium Hydroxide, Xanthan Gum, F.I.L. B55466/1, 69506523.

Brand Overview

Garnier Nutritioniste At-A-Glance

Strengths: Interesting and potentially helpful cleansing oil and foundation primer.

Weaknesses: Insufficient UVA protection from some of the sunscreens; average to below average moisturizers and eye creams; mostly irritating cleansers; no effective products for blemish-prone skin; jar packaging.

Debuting with permanent hair dye and then making the segue to a full line of hair-care products emphasizing carefree, casual styles with can't-miss-it colorful packaging has been Garnier's formula for penetrating the U.S. market. Several well-known actresses have had dual roles as spokesperson for Garnier's hair dyes and skin-care products, with splashy ads appearing in magazines and on television commercials.

Unfortunately, this group of products hasn't got much going for it except the lure celebrity spokespeople provide. The amount of fragrance is perhaps forgivable for a French-owned product line, and in most of the Nutritioniste products it's not too intrusive. What is deplorable is the lack of sufficient UVA protection in the sunscreens. A skin-care line has no right to speak about the anti-aging benefits and "breakthrough approach" of its products when they cannot get this fundamental aspect consistently right.

It's also disappointing that some products contain irritating peppermint, which made us wonder whether the dermatologists who consulted for Garnier had any idea of what's good for skin and what isn't. It seems they didn't, because what they ended up with is a mix of pro and con products that make it impossible for consumers to assemble a sensible skin-care routine, not to mention products that make skin-lifting claims most dermatologists would dismiss as cosmetics puffery.

The hook for this line is the way it is said to bring nutrition and dermatology together. The products are "fortified" with antioxidants such as lycopene and nutritional ingredients such as fatty acids, vitamins (A and C, never present together in the same product!), and minerals. Garnier wants you to think this is a revolutionary idea, but it isn't—did they also overlook that everyone else, from L'Oreal (Garnier is owned by L'Oreal) to Estee Lauder and Clinique, has been using such ingredients in their products for years? And why consult a nutritionist (as Garnier did) when their training and professional expertise has little to do with application of anything to the skin? The whole scenario proves Garnier was more concerned with creating an attention-getting story for this line rather than formulating truly breakthrough products.

Despite our disdain for the way Garnier's marketing takes precedence over making the products as good as they could be formulary-wise, there are some bright spots. Because Garnier is owned by L'Oreal, it's no surprise to find that there are lots of similarities between the better and worse aspects of L'Oreal's skin care as well as with L'Oreal's department-store sister company Lancome. In some ways, Garnier's formulas best those of both companies by including a greater array of antioxidants and intriguing skin-identical ingredients. The occasional jar packaging choice reduces the effectiveness of some of these products, but other than that, Lancome users should take note of the happy face–rated products in this line. You'll be getting a better product for considerably less money here (though, at least for now, no free gift with purchase—but you can buy Lancome foundations or mascaras instead when gift time comes around).

For more information about Garnier Nutritioniste, call (800) 370-1925 or visit www.garnierusa.com.

About the Experts

The new Beautypedia Team proudly and unequivocally maintains the commitment to help you find the best products possible for your skin. We do this by relentlessly pursuing and relying on published scientific research so you will have unbiased information on what works and what doesn't-and the sneaky ways you could be making your skin worse, not better!

The Beautypedia Team reviews all products using the same research, criteria, and objectivity, whether the product being reviewed is from Paula's Choice or another brand.

Member Comments
Summary of Member Comments
Sort by:
They changed the formula

I used to love using this on days when I woke up with puffy eyes. I'd keep it in the fridge and it definitely. The ratings I gave above were for the original formula. Unfortunately, I realized that I had mine for a while and should probably get a replacement. So I went to the drug store and when I picked it up I saw it said New Formula so I checked the back for the ingredients. Alcohol Denat. is one of the main ingredients now. I think they also added mint as well.

Reviewed by
Keep expectations low

After trying both pressing chilled spoons under my eyes, then later using Preparation H (which is supposed to be good for puffy eyes), I got this product hoping it would "deflate" my puffiness like they claim. I wanted to get Sudden Change, something Rite Aid used to carry, and something someone said actually worked for her. But I couldn't find it anymore. This product requires just 1 or 2 rolls of the ball to get the product itself moving. Then, it takes at least 3 or 4 times rolling under the eye to get the product applied. It takes about 5 minutes for me for it to absorb. It does smooth out or tighten my fine lines a little, and it works well under makeup. But it definitely does NOT "anti-puff", instantly or otherwise. I've got dark circles from the SHADOWS cast from the puffiness, so this wouldn't work--nor does concealer. I've read some reviews from others online who said the caffeine in it made them jittery or even made their eyes twitch! I didn't have these problems. I've got allergies, and sometimes I think it's a result of that---as it will sometimes deflate a LITTLE on its own. But I still seem to have a constant puffiness I didn't have when I was younger, even when it's not allergy season. I'm 51 now, and this puffiness may be part of aging that has finally hit me, those "fat pads" you can't get rid of. My skin is sagging in other areas, so puffiness is likely too. I plan to use up the product, even though I could return it. But I won't get it again.

Reviewed by
Black Cat
Enter a title for your review
First Name, Last Initial
Email Address
How would you rate this product on the following:
500 characters left

Terms of Use

585623-IIS1 v1.0.0.431 10/4/2015 4:35:50 AM