The Vital C Hydrating Anti-Aging Serum, like many of the other formulas in IMAGES Skincare's Vital C collection, is a frustrating product. The formula contains an array of antioxidants, cell-communicating ingredients, and skin-repairing ingredients. Unfortunately, a stiff dose of the fragrant mandarin orange (Citrus nobilis) peel oil is also on hand, keeping this otherwise stellar formula from earning our top rating.
Research has shown that the fragrance components (limonene and geraniol) in the orange oil this product contains have a strong potential to provoke an allergenic and irritant response on the skin (Sources: Contact Dermatitis, 2006 and 2012). The damaging impact of this type of inflammation in skin will fight against the anti-aging goals you are trying to reach when using a product like this. See More Info for additional details on fragrance in skin-care products.
Instead of this product, consider any of the better-formulated alternatives in Beautypedia's list of Best Serums. Each of the recommended serums from these brands contains a skin-friendly mix of antioxidants, cell-communicating ingredients, and skin-repairing ingredients—and none share the fragrant shortcoming of Vital C Hydrating Anti-Aging Serum.
- Contains a comprehensive array of antioxidants and cell-communicating ingredients.
- Includes beneficial skin-repairing ingredients and emollients.
- Includes a potent amount of mandarin orange peel oil (in fact, more orange peel oil than many of the beneficial ingredients), which has well-established irritant potential for the skin.
Irritation from Fragrance: Daily use of products that contain a high amount of fragrance, whether the fragrant ingredients are synthetic or natural, causes chronic irritation that can damage healthy collagen production, lead to or worsen dryness, and impair your skin's ability to heal. Fragrance-free is the best way to go for all skin types. If fragrance in your skin-care products is important to you, it should be a very low amount to minimize the risk to your skin (Sources: Inflammation Research, December 2008, pages 558–563; Skin Pharmacology and Physiology, June 2008, pages 124–135, and November-December 2000, pages 358–371; Journal of Investigative Dermatology, April 2008, pages 15–19; Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, March 2008, pages 78–82; Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, January 2007, pages 92–105; and British Journal of Dermatology, December 2005, pages S13–S22).
This Vitamin C serum minimizes and soothes the effects of environmentally damaged skin. Vitamins A, C and E and anti-oxidants nourish the skin to create radiant youthful skin.
Water (Aqua), Sodium Hyaluronate, Magnesium Ascorbyl Phosphate, Imperata Cylindrica (Root) Extract, Linoleic Acid, Phospholipids, Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride, Glycine Soja (Soybean) Sterols, Glyceryl Stearate, Palmitoyl Pentapeptide-4, Acetyl Hexapeptide-8, Citrus Nobilis (Mandarin Orange) Peel Oil, Centella Asiatica Extract, Tetrahexyldecyl Ascorbate, Palmitoyl Oligopeptide, Darutoside, Stearoyl Glycyrrhizate, Vitis Vinifera (Grape) Seed Extract, Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract, Corallina Officinalis Extract, Panthenol, Ascorbyl Palmitate, Ascorbic Acid Prunus Amygdalus Dulcis (Sweet Almond) Oil, Linoleamidopropyl PG-Dimonium Chloride Phosphate, Tocopherol, Simmondsia Chinensis (Jojoba) Seed Oil, Squalene, Tocopheryl Acetate, Yeast Polysaccharides, Olea Europea (Olive) Leaf Extract, Citric Acid, Dipotassium Glycyrrhizate, Spiraea Ulmaria Flower Extract, Phyllanthus Emblica Fruit Extract, Disodium EDTA, Magnesium Aluminum Silicate, Glucosamine HCL, Algae Extract, Saccharomyces Cerevisiae (Yeast Extract), Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice Powder, Polysorbate 20, Xanthan Gum Leucine, Valine Tyrosine, Arginine, Lysine
IMAGE Skincare, a brand operated out of West Palm Beach, Florida, focuses on the concept of “pharmaceutical grade” skin-care products (more on that in a moment). Developed by its president and CEO, Janna Robert, IMAGE Skincare is distributed in spas and dermatology offices. However, it can also be found on retail websites like Amazon (despite the company’s claim that these aren’t approved retailers).
The IMAGE Skincare approach promotes the concept that those of a certain age should use a certain line of products—a visit to their website’s product recommendation page has their five collections categorized by age range, which is a silly concept.
Here’s why that approach makes for poor skin care: Simply put, age is not a skin type—the types of ingredients skin needs to stay healthy and act younger are the same whether you’re 10, 20, 30, 40, or 50 years old, or beyond. Just as a healthy diet doesn’t change as you age, the same is true for skin care. What skin needs to be healthy does not change with age.
To underscore this fact, IMAGE Skincare’s recommendations are virtually identical, no matter which age range you select. Interestingly, their age ranges are grouped into three categories: 1–18 (OK, … a 1-year-old? How bizarre is that! A baby is supposed to have a skin-care routine?); 19–35; and then...”36+.”
Someone over the age of 40 (all the way to those over 65) can have oily skin and breakouts, and teens can have dry, sun-damaged skin. Research shows that the same ingredients are needed to improve and heal the problem, regardless of age. Relating age to skin care is just silly!
IMAGE Skincare defines their “aging later” approach to mean that if you want to delay the signs of aging, you need to give skin more of what it needs to stay healthier, longer. That includes their recommendation of regular use of AHA/BHA exfoliants, formulas loaded with antioxidants and cell-communicating ingredients, as well as wearing a broad-spectrum sunscreen every day.
We absolutely agree with those points—anti-aging is about taking care of your skin, keeping it protected from environmental harms (i.e., unprotected sun exposure and pollution), and ensuring that all of your products are loaded with beneficial ingredients, no matter your age. Their list of recommendations should also include using products that are free of irritants; that is, ingredients that have documented research indicating their potential to harm skin by causing inflammation and free-radical damage.
Unfortunately, that latter point is where many of IMAGE Skincare’s products veer off the mark. For all their claims of including only what’s best for the skin, we were disappointed to find that almost all of their products contain at least one irritating fragrance extract or essential oil (some IMAGE Skincare products are overloaded with them), and the fragrance is often overwhelming, lingering on the skin and wafting from the container immediately on opening.
On a side note, the intense fragrance of many of their products makes us skeptical of their ingredient lists—they don’t list what could be causing the perfume-like, sickly sweet odor. Fragrance, whether natural or synthetic, is a problem for the skin because of the irritations it can cause.
What about their claim of offering “pharmaceutical grade” ingredients and formulas? When a brand uses the term “pharmaceutical” in describing their products, they’re trying to invoke the idea that their formulas are somehow different or “stronger” than those you can find anywhere else. This is nothing more than marketing wordplay—there are no (repeat, no) pharmaceutical-grade skin-care products because the term is not regulated by the FDA, so there is no standard or meaning to the claim. Just as the words “cosmeceutical” and “hypoallergenic” are meaningless, “pharmaceutical grade” is as well.
What matters is that the ingredients they include have published, peer-reviewed research and that your products conform to the safety guidelines and standards set forth in the FDA’s labeling regulatory requirements (or international regulatory bodies, if you’re outside the United States).
Strangely enough, it was challenging to find accurate ingredient lists for IMAGE Skincare. In some instances, the list on the packaging was incomplete and/or very different from the ingredient list found online (even from “approved” resellers allegedly using information supplied by IMAGE). We are reluctant to trust any company that can’t get this simple regulation right; think about buying food at the grocery store that didn’t have a label listing everything that was in it.
For example, IMAGE Skincare’s Prevention + Daily Matte Moisturizer Oil Free SPF 30+ claims to contain microsponge technology (absorbent polymers that help to control excess oil), and yet the product packaging doesn’t list any such ingredients. And, in the case of one of their anti-acne treatments, the combined use of the two active ingredients falls outside of FDA guidelines for anti-acne products (Source: FDA 21 CFR 333.310, 2014).
In the end, some of the products IMAGE Skincare offers are (possibly) worth looking into, but overall we were disappointed in the brand because so many of their formulas, including those of some otherwise impressive products, contained an excess of fragrance, made outlandish marketing claims, and had an abundance of ingredient misinformation wrapped in “pharmaceutical-grade” pseudoscience. We prefer science based in reality—everything else is just hype, and hype is not the way to take the best possible care of your skin… at any age!
For more information about IMAGE Skincare, call 1-800-796-SKIN (7546) or visit www.imageskincare.com.