03.19.2013
0
1
C-15 Serum Advance +
Rating
1 fl. oz. for $84
Category:Skin Care > Serums
Last Updated:03.19.2013
Jar Packaging:No
Tested on animals:No
Review Overview

This is a simple, water-based serum that contains vitamin C in the form of ascorbic acid. They claim that the product contains 15% ascorbic acid, but given that sodium hyaluronate precedes it on the ingredient list and that the common usage level of sodium hyaluronate is 2% or less, I doubt very much that the product really contains 15% ascorbic acid. This serum is mostly water and perhaps 1% vitamin C. Assuming the vitamin C content was actually 15%, is that better for your skin? No. Vitamin C offers multiple benefits for skin but too much of it (especially when its native form, ascorbic acid, is used) can be more irritating than helpful. It does not contain copper tripeptide growth factors as claimed, as these are nowhere to be found on the ingredient list (and we always use what the company provides on the package as mandated by FDA regulations). Note that this serum is packaged in an amber glass bottle that isn’t entirely impervious to light. If you decide to try this serum, although there’s no compelling reason to do so, make sure you store it in a cool, dark place and recap tightly after each use.

Another concern is the inclusion of zinc sulfate. This ingredient is created from the reaction of sulfuric acid and zinc, and it is one of the forms of zinc that can be a skin irritant (Source: www.naturaldatabase.com).

Claims

This serum contains a powerful 15% Vitamin C along with Copper Tripeptide Growth Factors to produce rapid and pronounced improvements to skin.

Ingredients

Water, Sodium Hyaluronate, Ascorbic Acid, Propylene Glycol, Zinc Sulfate, Bioflavonoids, Phenoxyethanol

Brand Overview

iS Clinical At-A-Glance

Strengths: Good (but pricey) water-soluble cleanser; one exceptional serum and eye cream; good body lotion.

Weaknesses: Very expensive; repetitive serum formulas; several serums contain skin-damaging alcohol; impossible to assemble a comprehensive skin-care routine; the SPF 20 Powder Sunscreen is terribly dry and a huge mess to use; skin lighteing products whose benefits are iffy, yet they cost a fortune.

From a marketing point of view iS Clinical is trying to be yet another "cosmeceutical" line of products designed by physicians and pharmacologists. The owners of iS Clinical claim to have assembled a "world renowned" team to bring consumers the best in anti-aging skin care and what they describe as "anti-aging medicine," even though iS Clinical products aren't about medicine any more than a spoonful of sugar is about medicine (with apologies to Mary Poppins).

The "iS" in the brand's name stands for "innovative skincare." Couple this with the "clinical" portion of the name and it's hardly surprising that lots of consumers concerned about aging skin are wondering yet again if this is the final frontier for their older looking skin. We'll cut to the chase: iS Clinical isn't the anti-aging line to beat, buy, or borrow. In many ways, several of their products are either dated, antiquated formulations or basic one-note products. Overall, their products don't hold up to lots of other products with far superior formulations, many of which cost a lot less, such as Clinique, Estee Lauder, and Paula's Choice to name a few.

The prices for iS Clinical products are definitely on the high side, which is one reason why it's critical that you know which ones are worth the splurge and which ones are a must to avoid, not only for the sake of your beauty budget but also for the health of your skin. As usual in such lines, there are a handful of outstanding products to consider, but there also are a lot to watch out for.

Back to the team behind this brand: If they're indeed preeminent men and women in their fields, it's truly embarrassing that they've created products whose claims are not based on proven, substantiated scientific research. For example, instead of using thoroughly researched exfoliants, such as glycolic acid or lactic acid, iS Clinical went back to the 1990s fad of including mixed fruit and sugarcane extracts for exfoliation. Think of it as using a typewriter instead of a computer; why would you ever go back to a typewriter?

Another shortcoming is their Active Serum for acne, which contains a lot of skin-damaging alcohol and menthol (both really bad for skin), while being void of ingredients proven to benefit blemish-prone skin.

One more point: iS Clinical promotes, under their "Integrity" header on their Web site, the idea that they "…strive to dispel myths in the skincare industry by disclosing and clinically validating all of the ingredients we use." However, there is absolutely not a shred of clinical validation anywhere to be found. It seems that iS Clinical wants you to think they're doing the consumer a favor by providing ingredient lists on each product, but disclosing ingredient information is required by law and has been in the United States since 1976—it's not a discretionary decision cosmetics companies can sidestep, although some have tried! Besides, the company's site only lists key ingredients (those they want to play up) so you're still not getting the full story.

It's almost funny, but not really, that as a way to explain the rationale behind their formulas, they have a section on their Web site called "Clinical Opinions." Well, "opinions" are not the same as scientifically validated research, and that's precisely what is lacking. In fact, the information presented has little to do with skin care. It's actually bizarre because the only thing they provide is a set of the same tired before-and-after pictures and improvement charts for certain products; but, without knowing key details about how the tests were performed and under what conditions the pictures were taken, they aren't just opinions, they are misleading.

For more information about iS Clinical, call (888) 804-4447 or visit www.isclinical.com.

Note: Now this was a first! When my team contacted iS Clinical to inquire about their animal testing status, we were told that they do not make this claim because they believe human beings are animals, and of course, their products are meant for people. We have no idea what that means.

About the Experts

The new Beautypedia Team proudly and unequivocally maintains the commitment to help you find the best products possible for your skin. We do this by relentlessly pursuing and relying on published scientific research so you will have unbiased information on what works and what doesn't-and the sneaky ways you could be making your skin worse, not better!


The Beautypedia Team reviews all products using the same research, criteria, and objectivity, whether the product being reviewed is from Paula's Choice or another brand.

Member Comments

No members have written a review yet. Be the first!

WRITE A COMMENT
Enter a title for your review
 
First Name, Last Initial
Optional
Email Address
 
How would you rate this product on the following:
Results
Value
Recommend
     
     
     
Review
500 characters left
 
SUBMIT
CANCEL

Terms of Use

PCWEB-WWW1 v1.0.0.405 7/28/2015 10:23:45 AM