The nighttime counterpart to L'Oreal's Revitalift Clinical day product, this moisturizer makes the same claim of being able to fight the 10 visible signs of aging. Unfortunately, the formula doesn't succeed in making the claim a reality.
They mention just about every sign-of-aging concern a person may have, from wrinkles to loss of firmness and sagging, yet the truth is no single product (or ingredient) can address all those issues. Think of it like your diet and how there isn't one powerhouse meal you can eat that addresses all aspects of your health.
What's 100% true about this product and its ability to fight signs of aging is that the formula is mostly average. It has a silky, lightweight texture, but lacks anti-aging ingredients that research has proven help stimulate collagen production, improve skin tone, or strengthen skin so it's better able to repair damage. At best, you're getting an OK moisturizer for normal to dry skin. The cell-communicating ingredient adenosine is present, but that’s little consolation for what's missing (plus, adenosine alone isn't enough to fight multiple signs of aging).
This contains mica for a soft shine finish, but shine isn't skin care. As for the salicylic acid, the amount is too low for it to function as an exfoliant—and without question a well-formulated exfoliant can make a dramatic difference in the appearance of aging skin.
This product contains methylisothiazolinone, a preservative known to be sensitizing and generally not advised for use in leave-on products (it's fine in rinse-off products like cleansers or shampoos).
- Silky-smooth texture provides light hydration without a greasy feel.
- Surprisingly average formula that cannot make good on most of its anti-aging claims.
- Lacks proven anti-aging ingredients.
- Contains a preservative (methylisothiazolinone) that is known to be sensitizing and that generally is not recommended for use in leave-on products.
- Adenosine is a good cell-communicating ingredient, but hardly the only anti-aging ingredient worth considering. It's best to see it in combination with repairing and antioxidant ingredients, which isn't the case here.
Silky, lightweight cream with Multi-Repair Complex fights the 10 visible signs of aging and helps reverse the damage done by time.
Water, Glycerin, Isohexadecane, Aluminum Starch Octenylsuccinate, Isopropyl Isostearate, Nylon-12, Octyldodecanol, Cetyl Alcohol, Behenyl Alcohol, C13-14 Isoparaffin, PEG-100 Stearate Stearic Acid, Stearyl Alcohol, Arachidyl Alcohol, Cetearyl Alcohol, Cetearyl Glucoside, Sodium Acrylates Copolymer, Palmitic Acid, Adenosine, Disodium EDTA, Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride, Capryloyl Salicylic Acid, Laureth-7, Poly C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate, Polyacrylamide, Polyethylene, Methylisothiazolinone, Phenoxyethanol, Yellow 6, Yellow 5, Titanium Dioxide, Mica
Just like its sister company Lancome, L'Oreal doesn't have its act together when it comes to skin-care products. For all their talk of advanced formulas, fancy double-page ads in fashion magazines, and impressive-sounding quotes from scientists at their research and development facilities, most of what L'Oreal offers for skin care is a whole lot of nothing—or at least nothing tremendously helpful for helping skin look and feel its best.
An ongoing issue with L'Oreal (at least in the United States) is the lack of sufficient UVA-protecting ingredients in their daytime moisturizers with sunscreen. Very few of them contain the actives that provide as much UVA protection as you can get from a sunscreen. Yet this major oversight (and it’s not just with the older products—several newer sunscreens launched with this deficiency) didn't stop L'Oreal from heralding the FDA's approval of their patented ecamsule (Mexoryl SX) sunscreen for use in the United States. (Mexoryl SX has been approved for years in Europe, and L'Oreal routinely uses it in the sunscreens they sell there.) The attention-getting headline was that Mexoryl SX provides "the best" and "most stable" UVA protection, but that's not entirely true; there are other options. Why didn't anyone in the media point out to L'Oreal that while Mexoryl SX may be great, that doesn't explain why the majority of their other sunscreens leave the consumers who use them vulnerable to UVA damage… Sigh… Inadequate UVA protection is not only unhealthy for your skin, it severely damages L'Oreal's credibility as an international skin-care authority.
Aside from the sunscreen frustrations, L'Oreal's moisturizers are a yawn-inducing, fairly repetitive bunch. A cursory review of their formulas demonstrates that L'Oreal is simply not keeping pace with the competition, just as Lancome isn't at the department-store level. When it comes to moisturizers or serums, just about anything from Dove, Olay, Neutrogena, or Aveeno is preferred. L'Oreal does well with most of their cleansers, along with scrubs and self-tanning products, but given the widespread availability and financial resources of this line they could be doing so much more. (You have to wonder if they're more interested in advertising and public relations than in advancing skin-care expertise.) The makeup has made major strides and now ranks as the best overall color collection at the drugstore—imagine the results if their skin care followed suit!
Note: Unless mentioned otherwise, all L'Oreal skin-care products contain fragrance.
For more information about L'Oreal, call (800) 322-2036 or visit www.loreal.com or www.lorealparisusa.com.
L’Oreal Paris Makeup
L'Oreal's extensive makeup collection retains its stature as the overall best at the drugstore, though they have stiff competition from Revlon and, in some cases, sister company Maybelline New York. In recent years L'Oreal has made significant strides with foundation shades, powder textures, concealers, and, of course, superlative mascaras that rarely fail to impress. Their lipsticks are excellent and you will find many L'Oreal makeup products have a Lancome counterpart, and that the differences are minor, if they exist at all.
L'Oreal's displays in many drugstores have been updated to reflect better-organized products and shade categories (though testers are still scarce). Given the number of lipsticks they sell, it only makes sense to put them in color families so consumers have a better shopping experience. Their True Match products are also sensibly laid out, but the rest of the foundations aren't as organized, likely due to the smaller selection of shades. Speaking of foundations, L'Oreal has made further strides by offering more that provide sufficient UVA protection. Revlon still has the edge for consistently launching impressive foundations with sunscreen, but at least L'Oreal is (finally) catching up. The bottom line is that every category of L'Oreal’s makeup has some winning (and in some cases, benchmark-setting) products. They fall short with their powder eyeshadows, but not enough to warrant avoiding them, especially if you prefer sheer eye makeup. Still, with only minor tweaking and consistent adherence to the importance of UVA protection in their cosmetic products with sunscreen, L'Oreal could pull ahead to be the hands-down winner when it comes to shopping for makeup at the drugstore.