M.A.C. is one of many cosmetics lines owned by Estee Lauder, and like all Lauder-owned brands, their eye cream formulas are typically impressive. Each contains an impressive mix of emollients, skin-repairing ingredients, antioxidants, and cell-communicating ingredients that help skin look and act younger. However, you don't need to bother with "eye" cream; we explain why in the More Info tab.
Because most of Lauder's eye creams are packaged in jars, the most important ingredients won't remain effective once you open the cream. See More Info for details on the problems jar packaging presents.
Another shortcoming of this product is that, despite containing some notable ingredients, it also contains several gimmicky, relatively useless ingredients. Among the gimmicky ingredients are diamond powder, which just adds shine—diamonds don't make skin younger; supposedly "charged" water, but water is water, and "charging" it isn't going to affect how it performs in a skin-care product; and the rosy-red gemstone rhodochrosite. None of these ingredients are special for skin around the eyes, or for anywhere on the face or body—they can't make dark circles lighter, improve wrinkles, or alleviate puffiness, but they do make for good ad copy!
One more comment: Unlike most eye creams, this contains fragrance. Granted, the amount is very low, but the eye area is most likely to react to fragranced products owing to its proximity to the eye itself.
- Contains a very good mix of anti-aging and skin-repairing ingredients.
- Helps brighten skin.
- Silky cream hydrates without feeling heavy.
- Jar packaging won't keep key ingredients stable during use.
- Contains some gimmicky ingredients with no proven benefits for skin.
Why You Don't Need an Eye Cream:
We know it's hard to believe, but the truth is you don't need a special product for the eye area, whether labeled eye cream or something else. Although there is much you can do to improve the skin around your eyes, the ingredients capable of doing that don't need to come from, and often aren't even included in, an eye cream. For example, most eye creams (such as this one) don't contain sunscreen, and that is a serious problem because it leaves the skin around your eyes vulnerable to sun damage, which will make dark circles and wrinkling worse!
You can save money and take superior care of your eye area by using your face product, if it is well formulated and appropriate for the skin type around your eyes!
Why Jar Packaging is a Problem:
The fact that it's packaged in a jar means the beneficial ingredients won't remain stable once it is opened. All plant extracts, vitamins, antioxidants, and other state-of-the-art ingredients break down in the presence of air, so once a jar is opened and lets the air in, these important ingredients begin to deteriorate. Jars also are unsanitary because you're dipping your fingers into them with each use, adding bacteria, which further deteriorate the beneficial ingredients (Sources: Free Radical Biology and Medicine, September 2007, pages 818–829; Ageing Research Reviews, December 2007, pages 271–288; Dermatologic Therapy, September-October 2007, pages 314–321; International Journal of Pharmaceutics, June 12, 2005, pages 197–203; Pharmaceutical Development and Technology, January 2002, pages 1–32; International Society for Horticultural Science, www.actahort.org/members/showpdf?booknrarnr=778_5; and Beautypackaging.com, and www.beautypackaging.com/articles/2007/03/airless-packaging.php).
A luxuriously rich eye cream. Infused with our ionized Super-Duo Charged Water technology. Moisturizes and adds radiance, while instantly - and over time - reducing the look of dark circles, lines and puffiness.
Water, Cyclopentasiloxane, Glycerin, Dimethicone, Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride Caprylic/Capric/Myristic/Stearic Triglyceride, Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil, Yeast Extract, Isononyl Isononanoate, Hydrogenated Polyisobutene, Cetyl PEG/PPG-10/1 Dimethicone, Sea Salt, Nylon-12, Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract, Algae Extract, Avena Sativa (Oat) Kernel Extract, Polygonum Fagopyrum Seed Extract, Gelidium Cartilagineum Extract, Prunus Amygdalus Dulcis (Sweet Almond) Seed Extract, Sigesbeckia Orientalis (St. Paul’s Wort) Extract, Crithmum Maritimum Extract, Whey Protein, Glycine, Soja (Soybean) Protein, Saccharomyces Ferment Filtrate, Caffeine, Cholesterol Tetraacetylphytosphingosine, Acetyl Glucosamine, Biotin, Magnesium Chloride, Palmitoyl Tetrapeptide-7, Dipeptide-2, Rhodochrosite, Aminopropyl Ascorbyl Phosphate, Acetyl Hexapeptide-8, Phytosphingosine, Propylene Glycol, Hexylene Glycol, Sucrose, Potassium Phosphate, Potassium Nitrate, Simethicone, Sodium Sulfate, Diamond Powder, Calcium Chloride, Triethoxycaprylylsilane, Polysorbate 80, Hydroxyethylcellulose, Polysilicone-11, Dimethicone Crosspolymer, PEG/PPG 18/18 Dimethicone, Silica, Alumina Steareth-20, Citric Acid, Linoleic Acid, Salicylic Acid, Fragrance, Limonene, Disodium EDTA, Hesperidin Methyl Chalcone, Phenoxyethanol, Sodium Benzoate, Mica, Titanium Dioxide
When it comes to skin care you may be tempted to dismiss the small assortment M.A.C. offers and skip right to their makeup with its well-earned positive reputation. But doing so would mean missing a handful of beautifully formulated products that are worth trying. By no means is M.A.C.'s skin-care line one-stop shopping (at least not if you have blemishes, skin discolorations, or require more than a couple options per category), but you'll find more than just the color products impressive here, and the prices aren't unreasonable either!Note:
M.A.C. is categorized as one that tests on animals because their products are sold in China. Although M.A.C. does not conduct animal testing for their products sold elsewhere, the Chinese government requires imported cosmetics be tested on animals, so foreign companies retailing there must comply. This requirement is why some brand’s state that they don’t test on animals “unless required by law”. Animal rights organizations consider cosmetic companies retailed in China to be brands that test on animals, and so does the Paula’s Choice Research Team.
For more information about M.A.C., owned by Estee Lauder, call (800) 588-0070 or visit www.maccosmetics.com.
What more can one say for this long-standing makeup line whose products have spoken eloquently for themselves for years? In many ways, M.A.C. is a pivotal line not only for makeup artists but also for any in-the-know cosmetics consumer. Although M.A.C. has several singularly outstanding products, they generally excel by virtue of the range of choices offered. The color selection for everything from lipsticks to foundations is exceptional. Also, most of the makeup brushes are beautiful, full, and soft, as well as properly sized to fit the contours of the face and eyes. It is typically a pleasure to shop this line, though we wish the tester units (especially for blush, eyeshadow, and lipstick) were arranged by formula and finish rather than by color.
M.A.C.'s salespeople are sometimes trained as makeup artists, too, though being part of the Estee Lauder corporation means they have pressure to meet sales quotas (and no gifts-with-purchase to serve as an enticement). For this reason, you may prefer shopping at one of M.A.C.'s freestanding or Pro stores. The sales pressure is all but absent, the staff tends to be true makeup artists rather than only salespeople, and the stores routinely offer makeup how-to classes, which are both fun and informative.
M.A.C. has launched several state-of-the-art products since the previous edition of this book. The prime additions are several improved foundations and concealers, superior loose and pressed powders, a couple of mascaras that compete nicely with those from lash-enhancing leader Lancome, buttery-smooth powder blushes, and the very popular (and deservedly so) Pro Longwear Lipcolour. Couple this with their long-standing products that have always performed well and offered neutral shades (Studio Fix, anyone?) and M.A.C. is a force to be reckoned with in the world of department-store makeup. The only disappointment of note is that several of their liquid foundations with sunscreen still lack sufficient UVA protection. Why is it that Lauder-owned Clinique and Prescriptives continually get this critical step right, while Lauder's namesake line, Bobbi Brown, and M.A.C. tend to falter? It's especially upsetting in M.A.C.'s case because the affected foundations otherwise have exemplary textures and a vast palette of neutral shades for fair to dark skin tones. Other than this important point, you really can't go wrong shopping this line, whether you're new to the world of makeup or a seasoned pro.
Note: M.A.C. sets itself apart from other beauty brands by staying ahead of the curve by launching a seemingly-constant rotation of impressive limited edition products, usually with fashion-forward themes. Though it's impossible to review every limited edition product, many of M.A.C.'s are as impressive as those in their permanent collection.