Tested on animals:No
MDSolarSciences Mineral Creme Broad Spectrum SPF 30 is nearly identical to their Mineral Creme SPF 50 formula, which means this is also a very good fragrance-free sunscreen. Packaged in a tube with a flip-top cap, this formula has a gel-cream texture and is best for those with normal to oily skin, including those with sensitive skin or rosacea. However, the aesthetics are not for everyone, as its water-free formula can feel heavy.
After it dries, the silicone base gives Mineral Creme Broad Spectrum SPF 30 a “silky” feel that provides a smooth finish on skin, but it’s almost entirely free of any moisturizing ingredients—hence our recommendation for normal to oily skin types.
The sunscreen actives include titanium dioxide (2%) and zinc oxide (17%), a duo that will absolutely provide protection against both UVA and UVB rays. However, this high percentage of mineral actives does lend a white cast to the formula, which is visible on darker skin tones. You can mix in a small amount of foundation or bronzer to help offset this effect, but it doesn’t completely solve the (potential) issue for some.
There are a few antioxidants present, such as green tea and vitamin C, but given the claims MDSolarSciences makes, we expecting more. Nevertheless, what’s here is good, and such ingredients do help offset environmental free-radical damage while also making the sunscreen even more effective.
This is also water-resistant up to 80 minutes; in fact, it’s an incredibly tenacious sunscreen! You may need to use a soft washcloth/cleansing brush, or use a bit of nonfragrant plant oil to break up the sunscreen prior to cleansing, because one pass with your cleanser will likely not be enough to remove it entirely.
Those prone to breakouts can certainly consider experimenting with this, but be sure to remove it completely in your nighttime cleansing routine. We should note that despite the “non comedogenic” or “doesn’t clog pores” claim, there is actually no such classification or standard for this—see the More Info section for details on why it’s a meaningless label.
This is on the pricey side for a sunscreen and we would love to have seen MDSolarSciences include more in the way of antioxidants, but this is nonetheless a unique formula to consider.
Note: MDSolarSciences makes the claim that this formula contains “naturally derived” mineral sunscreen actives, which is both accurate and misleading. Technically, all mineral sunscreen actives are engineered from earth elements, but what comes out of that engineered process is about as natural as the plastic used to house this product (or the silicones and polymers it contains). There is, of course, nothing at all wrong with using synthetically engineered ingredients, but it’s important to point out the silliness of this type of marketing claim.
- Provides broad-spectrum, mineral sunscreen protection.
- Fragrance-free formula.
- Includes antioxidant ingredients.
- Water-resistant up to 80 minutes.
- Unique gel-cream texture works well for normal to oily skin types.
- On the expensive side for a sunscreen.
- Tenacious; requires a bit of effort to remove completely.
Non-Comedogenic: Labels like “non-comedogenic” or “non-acnegenic” seem like safe bets, but are actually unhelpful because these terms were coined under test conditions that are not even remotely applicable to how you, or anyone for that matter, use skincare or makeup products. The “non-comedogenic” myth got its beginnings from a 1979 study published in the British Journal of Dermatology. This study examined the potential of various ingredients (cocoa and shea butters, lanolin and waxes, among others) to clog pores and lead to the formation of comedones—hence the term “comedogenic.”
Under the conditions of this study, 100% pure concentrations of ingredients were layered five times per application over a period of two weeks, without cleansing the skin at any time. The manner in which these tests were conducted is not remotely similar to how we use skincare or makeup products—plus very few products are formulated with 100% of any one ingredient. What really determines whether an ingredient present in your skincare or makeup products is likely to trigger a breakout is how much of the ingredient is present in the formula and what else you apply as part of your skincare routine.
The researcher largely credited for developing the concept of comedogenic, Albert Kligman, said as much in his 1972 study, “Acne Cosmetica”:
“It is not necessary to exclude constituents which might be comedogenic in a pure state. The concentration of such substances is exceedingly important. To exile such materials as lanolin, petroleum hydrocarbons, fatty alcohols, and vegetable oils from cosmetics would be irrational. What is ultimately important is the comedogenicity of the finished product (Archives of Dermatology, 1972).”
Last, the terms non-comedogenic and non-acnegenic are not regulated so they’re not beholden to any agreed-upon standards. Any product, from the richest cream to the thinnest lotion, can use these claims and not have to prove they really don’t clog pores or trigger acne breakouts.