Is this a brilliant way to combine sunscreen, a touch of color, and lots of bells and whistles for skin in one apply-and-get-out-the-door product? The answer is a confusing yes and no. The in-part avobenzone sunscreen is a plus, as is the silky texture laced with an efficacious amount of the cell-communicating ingredient niacinamide. It also applies smoothly, blends well, and sets to a soft matte finish. The problem is that the single shade available won’t work for all skin tones (it’s best for those with light to medium skin tones that are not overtly pink), and although it’s sheer, if the color isn’t right for you, the difference will be obvious. Olay would have been better off launching this in three or four shades for various skin tones (and they clearly know how to do that given the impressive improvements seen in Cover Girl’s foundations; remember, both Cover Girl and Olay are owned by Procter & Gamble).
As it turns out, this is a brilliant option only if the single shade matches your skin well enough to look convincing. If that’s the case, the formula, which is good but could’ve ramped up the antioxidants a bit, is best for normal to slightly oily or slightly dry skin. Neutrogena’s Healthy Skin Tone Enhancer SPF 20 is a comparable product with a better formula and several shades.
Note: Although SPF 15 is good, the latest research suggests that products with higher SPF ratings are more desirable due to the further protection they can provide. Therefore, this tinted moisturizer’s rating is due to its overall performance rather than its SPF rating. Consider layering this with another SPF product for enhanced protection. .
Contains seven anti-aging benefits in one bottle and the sheer coverage women are looking for during the day. Helps to renew, restore and protect aging skin with the added benefit of immediate tone improvement. The touch of sheer foundation balances uneven tone leaving visibly younger-looking skin.
Active: Octisalate (4%), Avobenzone (2%), Octocrylene (1%), Ensulizole (1%), Other: Water, Glycerin, Niacinamide, Dimethicone, Titanium Dioxide, Isopropyl Palmitate, Aluminum Starch Octenylsuccinate, Behenyl Alcohol, Sodium Ascorbyl Phosphate, Panthenol, Tocopheryl Acetate, Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract, Zinc Oxide, Stearyl Alcohol, Sorbitan Stearate, Polyacrylamide, Polyethylene, Triethanolamine, Cetyl Alcohol, Benzyl Alcohol, Dimethiconol, PEG-100 Stearate, C13-14 Isoparaffin, Laureth-7, Cetearyl Glucoside, Cetearyl Alcohol, Ammonium Polyacrylate, Stearic Acid, Methylparaben, Propylparaben, Ethylparaben, Fragrance, Triethoxycaprylylsilane, Iron Oxides
Olay offers a fairly large selection of skin-care products sold at drugstores and mass-market stores. Although Olay's products are not as diversified as Neutrogena's or as attractive as L'Oreal's, Olay has come a long way from its star product being a soft pink lotion designed to make skin younger (yet it was and is just a badly formulated product that was out of date almost from the moment it was launched). Today's Olay lineup for those concerned about staving off the effects of aging skin is impressive, comprising their Regenerist, and Total Effects lines. All of these (and several other Olay products) contain the B vitamin niacinamide. As you might expect, the claims made for it are inflated, but, as explained in the various reviews below, niacinamide is a very helpful ingredient for all skin types, capable of exerting multiple benefits. It isn't the best ingredient out there (no single ingredient has that title yet, and it's unlikely that just one ever will be) and as such doesn't deserve the prominence Olay gives it (a bit of variety would have been far better, such as a mix of antioxidants and skin-identical ingredients).
Olay's sales are expected to reach $4 billion annually in the next few years, and given their global presence in stores and constant advertising in magazines and on television, that's not surprising. Much of this advertising is focused on their best products, which is attention well deserved. Just to give you an idea of the expenditure involved for these ubiquitous ads, Olay spent over $50 million to promote Regenerist in 2003. The good news is that each new range of Olay products generally improves on what came before it, offering results that, while not as impressive as the claims, are noticeable in the mirror.
For its ongoing commitment to understanding consumers and formulating products that, while not perfect, definitely offer more proof than puffery, Olay deserves consideration by any savvy skin-care shopper. And it also deserves mention that Olay is one of the few lines in this book whose entire collection of products with sunscreens provides sufficient UVA protection! (Sources for the financial figures above: The Rose Sheet, July 10, 2006, page 5; September 11, 2006, page 4; and January 1, 2007, page 5).
Olay began 2009 with the launch of Pro-X, their most expensive products to date. Not only are these products considerably more expensive than any others from Olay, the packaging, color scheme, advertising campaign, and claims have all been turned up to "max" on the cosmetics marketing dial. The amount of hype and budget thrown at these products easily explains why our Beautypedia product request e-mail inbox has been inundated with requests for me to review these products!
Whenever something this sleek-looking and pricey debuts in the mass market, lots of consumers wonder whether the extra expense is worth it. They also want to know if Olay's "Professional" designation makes these products a cut above the numerous other products they sell, including those with similar claims.
It turns out we had the same question after surveying the ingredient lists for all of the Pro-X products: How are they different from those available in Olay's Total Effects and Regenerist? Supposedly, all of those other sub-brands also have the answer to improving the telltale signs of aging, from dryness and wrinkles to loss of luminosity and unwanted discolorations. In fact, the claims on the label of these three lines are virtually identical.
It is clear from the get go that there are far more similarities than differences among Definity, Regenerist and Pro-X. All of them contain niacinamide, the B vitamin that has almost single-handedly re-energized Olay as a formidable skin-care brand. One of the Pro-X products contains acetyl glucosamine, just like several from Definity, and many Pro-X products contain peptides, just as Regenerist products do. Why should someone consider Pro-X over those other lines?
Interestingly, the folks we spoke with at Procter & Gamble didn't have a clear answer either, which isn't surprising, at least not from a formula superiority standpoint. Rather, their explanation was all about a marketing decision. This "cosmeceutical" –oriented line is supposed to give women who think that a line that looks medical must be better even if it's available at the drugstore. Pro-X was also designed to appeal to women who typically seek professional skin-care products, meaning those that are sold or recommended by a dermatologist or cosmetic surgeon.
Of course there is no standardized definition for "professional skin care" and "cosmeceutical" is a bogus term. The dermatologists who consulted Olay about these new products are well-respected, but the formulas still come up short in terms of a cocktail of antioxidants and skin-identical ingredients that can repair damaged skin. As it turns out, despite the Alliance for Skin Care Innovation that Olay speaks of in their promotional materials for Pro-X, its creation had more to do with marketing than with bringing anything new to the cosmetics table.
Don't get me wrong: the Pro-X products have some commendable attributes and certainly offer multiple benefits for aging skin, but the truth is they're not different enough from Olay Regenerist or Definity products to warrant the higher price.
Pro-X's packaging is indeed sexier, the claims are more enticing, and the prices speak to a high-end consumer, but, to borrow a popular catchphrase from the 1980s, we were left wondering "Where's the beef?" The beef, as it were, is merely Olay creating products whose differences are much stronger from a marketing standpoint than from a formulary standpoint. That's not breakthrough news for your skin, and it's a fact that anyone considering Pro-X should know that other Olay products offer comparable benefits for less money. The only significant difference between Pro-X and Olay's other sub-brands is that Pro-X is fragrance-free; that's great, but you would think that leaving out an ingredient as opposed to adding one would lead to a price decrease rather than an increase. It's up to you if that point is enough to make the higher prices worthwhile.
For more information about Olay, owned by Procter & Gamble, call (800) 285-5170 or visit www.olay.com.