Super Acne Solution Green Apple Quercetin (Discontinued)

by Perricone MD Cosmeceuticals  Super by Perricone
Price:
$50 - 1 fl. oz.
Average Read Member Comments
Add To Faves»

Want to buy this product?

Category:
Skin Care > Anti-Acne Products > BHA
Last Updated:
1/31/2013
Jar Packaging:
No
pH:
>4.40
Tested On Animals:
No

This thin-textured BHA lotion exfoliant is medicated with 1% salicylic acid, a proven anti-acne superstar ingredient. Also present is the AHA ingredient glycolic acid, in what appears to be a 5% concentration. Although AHA and BHA don't need to be combined to get the benefits of exfoliation, some find the mix more helpful than using either one alone. The problem in this case is that the formula's pH of 4.4 is above the narrow pH range where glycolic and salicylic acids function best as exfoliants. That means this isn't the super solution for acne it's made out to be. Plus, you don't need to spend nearly this much for an effective exfoliant.

The rest of the formula is a mix of controversial, beneficial, and potentially irritating ingredients (including too much perfume), leading to a mixed bag of results. The controversial ingredient is dimethyl MEA (DMAE), which Perricone includes in most of his products. See More Info for a discussion of this ingredient and its risks for skin. As for the green apple and quercetin called out in this product's name, both are antioxidants, with quercetin being the more intriguing of the two because components of this antioxidant can help skin heal, too.

We're disappointed that this anti-acne product contains a high amount of apple fragrance because fragrance isn't skin care—it's a source of skin irritation. The antioxidants it contains are a nice touch, especially the quercetin, which is a very good topical antioxidant, but not enough to compensate for the weaknesses that make this product a tough sell for any skin type struggling with breakouts.

Pros:
  • Thin lotion formula contains some notable antioxidants, including quercetin.
Cons:
  • Expensive.
  • Cannot exfoliate skin because the product's pH is outside the required range.
  • Overly fragrant.
  • DMAE is a controversial ingredient.

As with most of Perricone's anti-aging products, this exfoliant contains dimethyl MEA. Also known as DMAE, this ingredient is controversial because research has shown conflicting results. It seems to offer an initial benefit that improves skin, but these results are short-lived and eventually give way to destruction of the substances in skin that help build healthy collagen (Sources: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, November-December 2007, pages 711–718; and American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, volume 6, 2005, pages 39–47).

Interestingly, there is a formulation challenge when including DMAE in skin-care products. To maintain the efficacy and stability of DMAE, a product's pH level must be at least 10, and a pH of 10 is highly alkaline, which isn't good news for skin. Moreover, because an exfoliant needs a pH range of 3–4 to be effective, in all likelihood the DMAE included in this product cannot have any prolonged functionality (Source: Journal of Drugs in Dermatology, Supplement 72, 2008, pages S17–S22).

A non-drying acne remedy gentle enough for daily use, formulated with Quercetin’s apple’s awesome antioxidant, and Salicylic Acid to prevent breakouts, use all over or as a spot treatment

Active: Salicylic Acid 1.0% Other Ingredients: Aqua (Water), Glycolic Acid, Isopropyl Palmitate, Dimethyl MEA (DMAE), Squalane, Cetearyl Alcohol, Glyceryl Stearate, PEG-100 Stearate, Benzyl Alcohol, Ceteareth-20, Parfum (Fragrance), Hydroxylated Lecithin, Phosphatidylcholine, Tetrahexyldecyl Ascorbate, Malic Acid, Quercetin, Thioctic Acid (Alpha-Lipoic Acid), Magnesium Aspartate, Zinc Gluconate, Disodium EDTA, Citric Acid, Allantoin, Docosahexaenoic Acid, Glycerin, Copper Gluconate, Pyrus Malus (Apple) Fruit Extract, Amyl Cinnamal, Citral, Phenoxyethanol

This dermatologist-developed line is perhaps the best known in an increasingly crowded field. The frenzy began with Nicholas Perricone's first book, The Wrinkle Cure, and continued when he appeared on PBS to discuss his book and namesake products, all of which seemed incredibly legitimate to consumers worried about how to look younger longer. PBS reaped a financial windfall from his appearance, netting millions of dollars between 2001 and 2002 (Source: www.quackwatch.org). Originally all the fuss centered around vitamin C and alpha lipoic acid, but as his success continued, Perricone wrote half a dozen more books and expanded his product line to include other over-hyped ingredients, each with claims (and price tags) more inflated than the last round.

We sourced the Web site Quackwatch.org because they have an excellent, unbiased report on the Perricone phenomenon. This non-profit site is operated by consumer advocate Dr. Stephen Barrett, and, to quote the Quackwatch Mission Statement, their purpose is "to combat health-related frauds, myths, fads, fallacies, and misconduct." That's where Perricone comes into play. According to Quackwatch, Perricone's books "contain many claims that are questionable, controversial, fanciful, unsupported by published evidence, or just plain wrong. Although he mentions standard skin-care treatments, sometimes favorably, his books provide little guidance about when they might be appropriate or sufficient. Although he provides long lists of references, practically none of them directly support what he promises." Those sentiments are exactly what we felt and wrote after reading The Wrinkle Cure.

The site goes on to state: "Perricone's books are sprinkled with statements that his ideas are based on his own research. However, the extent and quality of this research is unclear. A PubMed search for his name brought up only six citations, of which only two appear to be original research, both on topical glycolic acid. His books describe situations in which he tested various ideas in a few patients, usually over a short period of time, but he provides few details and apparently published none of those findings in medical journals." Does that sound like the kind of products you'd like to spend (a lot of) your money on?

They go on to conclude (and we agree completely with the following text): "Dr. Perricone has mixed a pinch of science with a gallon of imagination to create an elaborate, time-consuming, expensive, prescription for a healthy life and younger skin. There is no reason to think his program is more effective than standard measures. Although some of his advice is standard, most of his recommendations are based on speculation and fanciful interpretation of selected medical literature. He makes lots of money by convincing patients and consumers, but he hasn't succeeded in convincing critical thinkers, doctors, scientists, or anyone who wants to see hard evidence. Perricone's prescription isn't science; it's creative salesmanship." And which ingredient is the answer for healthy skin? Perricone can't seem to make up his mind, because one group of products contains alpha lipoic acid, another group olive oil, another vitamin C, and still another neuropeptides. Come on, doctor, which is it?

One ingredient Perricone uses deserves some discussion because it is present in all of his products, and that's dimethyl MEA, also known as DMAE (chemically 2-dimethyl-aminoethanol). DMAE has been around for years as an oral supplement that's popularly believed to improve mental alertness, much like Ginkgo biloba and coenzyme Q10. However, the research about DMAE does not show the same positive results as the other two supplements. Because DMAE is chemically similar to choline, DMAE is thought to stimulate production of acetylcholine. And because acetylcholine is a brain neurotransmitter, it's easy to see how it could be associated with brain function. However, only a handful of studies have looked at DMAE for that purpose and they have not been conclusive in the least, while some have shown that DMAE may be problematic or not very effective (Sources: Mechanisms of Aging and Development, February 1988, pages 129–138; Neuropharmacology, June 1989, pages, 557–561; European Neurology, 1991, pages 423–425; and European Journal of Medical Research, May 2003, pages 183–191).

How does any of this translate into skin care, or, more to the point, suppressing the signs of aging? Perricone claims DMAE restores muscle tone to skin that has lost firmness and has begun to slacken, as well as conveying an antioxidant benefit. Johnson & Johnson uses DMAE in a few of their Neutrogena products, and a study they paid for appeared in the American Journal of Clinical Dermatology (June 2005, pages 39–47). The conclusion was as follows: "the benefits of DMAE in dermatology include a potential anti-inflammatory effect and a documented increase in skin firmness with possible improvement in underlying facial muscle tone." The study examined topical application of 3% DMAE over a period of 16 weeks, but it was not done double-blind and was not placebo-controlled, which makes the results, at best, questionable. Moreover, the study didn't examine whether a 3% or lower concentration of other ingredients, such as green tea, glycolic acid, vitamin C, or myriad others (many of which Perricone has extolled in his other products, and the amount of DMAE he used varies widely from product to product), might have had the same or better results.

Is there any reason to get excited (and drain your pocketbook) for products with DMAE? Apparently not; a study published in The British Journal of Dermatology (May 2007) has shown contrary evidence that it may actually pose risks for the skin. In vitro tests of the pure substance, as well as creams that contained DMAE, demonstrated a fairly fast and significant increase in protective elements around the skin cell. However, a short time later the researchers observed an important reduction in cell growth and in some cases they found that it halted cell growth altogether. So, while you may initially experience a kind of swelling of the skin because of the expanding effect caused by topical application of DMAE, the long-term results appear to be far from desirable.

Interestingly, even though this ingredient is present throughout Perricone's line, he has yet to publish his own research discussing the claims and explaining how topical DMAE works. The bottom line is that as more research comes to light, DMAE may prove more problematic than helpful for aging skin. But in the meantime, Perricone is raking in lots of money by convincing consumers otherwise.

For more information about Perricone MD Cosmeceuticals call (888) 823-7837 or visit www.perriconemd.com.

Member Comments

Write A Review»

No members have written a review yet. Be the first!

About the Experts

Paula Begoun is the best-selling author of 20 books on skin care and makeup. She is known worldwide as the Cosmetics Cop and creator of Paula's Choice. Paula's expertise has led to hundreds of appearances on national and international television including:

View Media Highlights

 

The Paula's Choice Research Team is dedicated to helping you find the absolute best products for your skin, using research-based criteria to review beauty products from an honest, balanced perspective. Each member of the team was personally trained by Paula herself.

585623-IIS1 v1.0.0.335
Skip to Top of Page
15% Off Everything | FREE Shipping on $50+

Create an Account

Create Account»
  • »

New Customers

You will have the option to create an account after you have submitted your order.