11.06.2012
0
6
Natural Looking Self-Tanner (Discontinued)
Rating
5.3 fl. oz. for $28
Category:Skin Care > Self-Tanners > Self-Tanners
Last Updated:11.06.2012
Jar Packaging:No
Tested on animals:Yes
Review Overview

Natural Looking Self-Tanner is a good self-tanning lotion for normal to dry skin. Like most self-tanners, it’s dihydroxyacetone that turns skin color. This contains fragrance in the form of rose oil.

Claims

For face and body, this unique and innovative greaseless white lotion formulation will give your skin a beautiful natural looking golden bronze tan (without sun) in just a few hours that lasts for days.

Ingredients

Water, Dihydroxyacetone, Propylene Glycol, C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate, Glyceryl Stearate, PEG-100 Stearate, Chamomile Extract, Cetyl Esters, Squalane, Macadamia Nut Oil, Shea Butter, Polysorbate 40, Aloe Vera, Allantoin, Dimethicone, Rose Oil, Tocopherol Acetate (Vitamin E), Hydrolyzed Collagen, Methylparaben, Propylparaben, Ethylparaben, Butylparaben, Phenoxyethanol, Lecithin, Disodium EDTA

Brand Overview

Peter Thomas Roth At-A-Glance

Strengths: Provides complete ingredient lists on Web site; most products are fragrance-free; very good AHA products; wide selection of water-soluble cleansers and scrubs; some excellent sunscreens, benzoyl peroxide products, and many antioxidant-rich formulas.

Weaknesses: Expensive; mostly lackluster toners; mostly boring to potentially irritating masks; no BHA products that do not include at least one needless irritant; jar packaging.

Unique in the world of spa and salon specialty lines, Peter Thomas Roth is a large but straightforward line with mostly uncomplicated formulations that, for the most part, are quite good and state-of-the-art. Unlike many product lines, most of the acne, AHA, BHA, sunscreen, and moisturizing products contain what they should to be effective and helpful for skin.

A novel aspect of this line is that there are few (if any) nonsense ingredients. Roth products conspicuously lack the exotic, potentially irritating, sensitizing, and often unnecessary plant extracts and the irritating, fragrant plant oils that show up in most pricey skin-care lines, especially spa lines. Many of these products don't have fragrance, and they lack the long lists of ingredients that are often unnecessarily complicated. Even more impressive are the well-formulated cleansers, sunscreens, AHA products, and skin lighteners. The moisturizers have improved somewhat, and most are now packaged so that the light- and air-sensitive ingredients remain stable. In fact, Roth's packaging deserves special mention because it is exceptionally utilitarian and gender-friendly. No pretty pink bottles, sexy curved jars, or bejeweled caps—all of which reinforce the clinical nature of Peter Thomas Roth. Overall, this line should be admired for its simplicity and, for the most part, for its well-thought-out formulations.

After all that glowing praise there are a few embarrassing missteps to avoid, such as products that contain hydrogen peroxide, which can cause free-radical damage and hurt skin; irritating acne products that contain sulfur; unimpressive masks (odd for a spa-oriented line); and a bumper crop of products claiming to affect expression lines and wrinkles in a manner similar to cosmetic corrective procedures.

For more information about Peter Thomas Roth, call (800) PTR-SKIN or visit www.peterthomasroth.com.

About the Experts

The Beautypedia Research Team is dedicated to helping you find the absolute best products for your skin, using research-based criteria to review beauty products from an honest, balanced perspective. Each member of the team was personally trained by Paula Begoun herself.

Member Comments

No members have written a review yet. Be the first!

WRITE A COMMENT
Enter a title for your review
 
First Name, Last Initial
Optional
Email Address
 
How would you rate this product on the following:
Results
Value
Recommend
     
     
     
Review
500 characters left
 
SUBMIT
CANCEL

Terms of Use

585623-IIS1 v1.0.0.379 3/31/2015 8:21:43 PM