12.17.2014
3
2
Oilless Oil 100% Purified Squalane
Rating
1 fl. oz. for $38
Category:Skin Care > Body-Care Products > Face/Body Oils
Last Updated:12.17.2014
Jar Packaging:No
Tested on animals:Yes
Review Overview

Peter Thomas Roth makes much ado about (almost) nothing with their Oilless Oil 100% Purified Squalane. While the marketing claims may make squalane seem as if it is a special ingredient, it's as unique as canola oil and from a formulator's viewpoint, no more interesting than dozens of other moisturizing agents.

Squalane is a hydrogenated version of squalene, the latter being the pure component found in plants and animal sources. Squalene is rather unstable, however, and thus squalane is nearly all you'll find in cosmetics (the process of hydrogenation creates the stable squalane). Knowing this, it's a given to say that squalane is purified, as you can't really have it any other way in cosmetic formulas, so Peter Thomas Roth doesn't have an edge here.

The brand makes it clear that the source of their squalane is sugarcane. Why they make such special emphasis on sugarcane isn't exactly clear, as this is no more sustainable than other common plant sources of squalane (like olives), which is the typical source. As long as the world continues to consume olive oil, you'll not need to be concerned with the availability of squalane (but honestly, would you really even consider squalane if Peter Thomas Roth wasn't trying to tell you how special it is?).

If it sounds as if we're being hard on this product, it isn't rated POOR because technically squalane is still a good moisturizing agent. It's just that it's no more special than adding plain olive or grapeseed oil to your moisturizer. It's true that squalane isn't technically "oil", but that differentiation is somewhat pedantic, because many emollients aren't technically oils, but still behave similarly (like jojoba oil isn't technically an oil, it's a wax).

Ultimately, this is just a good, ordinary moisturizing ingredient for dry to very dry skin—consider this (like any non-fragrant plant oil) a fine option to add to your routine for extra moisture. No big whoop.

One last thing, the non-comedogenic claim is rubbish. There isn't any truth to the belief that certain ingredients are incapable of causing breakouts (and the claim that other ingredients are 100% certain to do so). Much of this depends on how much of an ingredient is present in a formula, the overall combination of other ingredients in a product, and numerous external factors.

Pros:
  • Squalane is a good moisturizing ingredient for dry skin (like any non-fragrant oil, i.e. olive oil or almond oil, etc.).
  • Fragrance-free.
Cons:
  • No more special than any other ordinary plant oil, like those you would find in your kitchen cupboard.
  • Overpriced for such a simple ingredient.
  • Non-comedogenic claims are pure marketing, like any emollient ingredient, squalane is capable of causing a breakout.
Claims

Oilless Oil 100% Purified Squalane is for anyone looking for all the benefits of an oil without leaving an oily or greasy after feel. It is lightweight, clear, and odorless. Oilless Oil is derived from farmed naturally-sourced sustainable sugarcane (not from sharks or olives). NON-COMEDOGENIC – will not cause breakouts.

Ingredients

Squalane

Brand Overview

Peter Thomas Roth At-A-Glance

Strengths: Provides complete ingredient lists on Web site; most products are fragrance-free; very good AHA products; wide selection of water-soluble cleansers and scrubs; some excellent sunscreens, benzoyl peroxide products, and many antioxidant-rich formulas.

Weaknesses: Expensive; mostly lackluster toners; mostly boring to potentially irritating masks; no BHA products that do not include at least one needless irritant; jar packaging.

Unique in the world of spa and salon specialty lines, Peter Thomas Roth is a large but straightforward line with mostly uncomplicated formulations that, for the most part, are quite good and state-of-the-art. Unlike many product lines, most of the acne, AHA, BHA, sunscreen, and moisturizing products contain what they should to be effective and helpful for skin.

A novel aspect of this line is that there are few (if any) nonsense ingredients. Roth products conspicuously lack the exotic, potentially irritating, sensitizing, and often unnecessary plant extracts and the irritating, fragrant plant oils that show up in most pricey skin-care lines, especially spa lines. Many of these products don't have fragrance, and they lack the long lists of ingredients that are often unnecessarily complicated. Even more impressive are the well-formulated cleansers, sunscreens, AHA products, and skin lighteners. The moisturizers have improved somewhat, and most are now packaged so that the light- and air-sensitive ingredients remain stable. In fact, Roth's packaging deserves special mention because it is exceptionally utilitarian and gender-friendly. No pretty pink bottles, sexy curved jars, or bejeweled caps—all of which reinforce the clinical nature of Peter Thomas Roth. Overall, this line should be admired for its simplicity and, for the most part, for its well-thought-out formulations.

After all that glowing praise there are a few embarrassing missteps to avoid, such as products that contain hydrogen peroxide, which can cause free-radical damage and hurt skin; irritating acne products that contain sulfur; unimpressive masks (odd for a spa-oriented line); and a bumper crop of products claiming to affect expression lines and wrinkles in a manner similar to cosmetic corrective procedures.

For more information about Peter Thomas Roth, call (800) PTR-SKIN or visit www.peterthomasroth.com.

About the Experts

The new Beautypedia Team proudly and unequivocally maintains the commitment to help you find the best products possible for your skin. We do this by relentlessly pursuing and relying on published scientific research so you will have unbiased information on what works and what doesn't-and the sneaky ways you could be making your skin worse, not better!


The Beautypedia Team reviews all products using the same research, criteria, and objectivity, whether the product being reviewed is from Paula's Choice or another brand.

Member Comments
Summary of Member Comments
Results
Value
Recommend
WRITE A COMMENT
Sort by:
Page:
01.09.2015
I love it.

It works for me. I have dry skin with hormonal acne. I use a drop or two on my face and backs of my hands all winter and when i really need the extra moisture. Not greasy, absorbed quickly and i do not break out any worse than i do without it.

Recommend
Value
Results
Reviewed by
Dena a
12.08.2014
Not worth the $

The moisturizers I prefer for my dry skin contain squalane. So I thought, why not try it on its own? It did nothing for me. I far prefer a blend of ingredients that provide lasting moisture over just one oil. This did not make me break out, but everyone is different. For me, Shea butter is a no. I recommend finding the ingredients common to the moisturizers you like before trying a new one - especially a formulation with few ingredients.

Results
Value
Recommend
Reviewed by
Helen A
02.06.2014
False claim!

This does absolutely cause acne! Do not use this if you are acne-prone! No benefits as far as I'm concerned. A "0"!

Results
Value
Recommend
Reviewed by
Annette D.
WRITE A COMMENT
Enter a title for your review
 
First Name, Last Initial
Optional
Email Address
 
How would you rate this product on the following:
Results
Value
Recommend
     
     
     
Review
500 characters left
 
SUBMIT
CANCEL

Terms of Use

585632-IIS4 v1.0.0.394 5/26/2015 5:12:26 AM