02.04.2014
2
7
Essentials Foaming Sunless Tan
Rating
4.2 fl. oz. for $24
Category:Skin Care > Self-Tanners > Self-Tanners
Last Updated:02.04.2014
Jar Packaging:No
Tested on animals:No
Review Overview

This liquid-to-foam self-tanner is suitable for all skin types. Its nearly weightless texture is easy to apply and, true to claim, this dries quickly. In terms of changing skin color, it contains the same ingredient (dihydroxyacetone) found in most self-tanners, be they liquids, gels, or lotions. This also contains the self-tanning ingredient erythrulose, which works slower than dihydroxyacetone for prolonged color.

It's nice that this contains antioxidants and skin-repairing phospholipids, but would be better without the fragrant narcissus bulb extract and inclusion of fragrance itself. Although you can find less expensive self-tanners that do the job just as well, this is worth trying if the price doesn't dissuade you.

Pros:
  • Easy to apply.
  • Doesn't feel heavy or slick on skin.
  • Dries fast.
Cons:
  • On the pricey side given its somewhat basic formula.
  • Contains a fragrant plant extract that poses a slight risk of irritation.
Claims

The lightweight, oil-free, mess-free sunless tanning foam applies easily and dries quickly. The effective dual-active formula ensures even, natural-looking color without exposure to the harmful UVA and UVB rays.

Ingredients

Water, Dihydroxyacetone, Polysorbate 20, Butylene Glycol, Glycerin, Phenoxyethanol, Caprylyl Glycol, Ethylhexylglycerin, Hexylene Glycol, Decyl Glucoside, Sodium Lactate, Ethoxydiglycol, Erythrulose, Narcissus Tazetta Bulb Extract, Phospholipids, Tocopheryl Acetate, Retinyl Palmitate, Ascorbyl Palmitate, Citric Acid, Fragrance.

Brand Overview

Rodan + Fields At-A-Glance

Strengths: Two fantastic skin-lightening products with hydroquinone; a well-packaged retinol product; every sunscreen provides sufficient UVA protection; some fragrance-free options.

Weaknesses: Expensive; jar packaging hinders effectiveness of several otherwise impressive products; sunscreens should contain more bells and whistles for the money; eyebrow-raising amount of products with irritating ingredients.

Many of you are probably familiar with physicians Katie Rodan and Kathy Fields from their appearances on infomercials about their successful ProActiv line of anti-acne skin-care products. The Rodan + Fields supposedly therapeutic approaches are advertised for those suffering from a variety of skin conditions, and are claimed to work for anti-aging, skin discolorations, sensitive skin, and acne.

Lots of consumers believe that dermatologist-developed products will be the answer for their skin-care woes; but, in two words, they aren't. After reviewing dozens of so-called doctor-designed product lines, including this one, we can tell you there are no miracles to be found, and often there are some problematic products to steer clear of. Overall, many of these lines are quite comparable to other product lines without the physician headliner credentials and exorbitant prices. (Shockingly, Rodan + Fields' acne products are virtually identical to their ProActiv products, except that these cost more. We assume they thought no one would notice; perhaps they are right.)

Many consumers want simplicity when it comes to making decisions about what skin-care products they should use. The Rodan + Fields marketing strategy is to make it simple. They eliminate the confusion about what products work together by creating streamlined, prepackaged product groups, each aimed at specific skin-care concerns. Each product group is enclosed in a clever, take-along parcel that is the skin-care equivalent of a sack lunch. (Products are also available separately for those who want to customize their routine or add products outside the predetermined routines.) This structured approach has merit, but, as you will see from the reviews below, each routine has at least one questionable or lackluster formulation, or a problem with packaging. Considering that these are really pricey products, this is not good news.

Rodan + Fields does deserve kudos for being one of the few cosmetics companies to list the ingredients for each product on their Web site. It’s a major help for beleaguered, savvy consumers who care about this detail. Still, it would have been better all around if they offered more thoughtful, less problematic formulas.

For more information about Rodan + Fields, call (888) 995-5656 or visit www.rodanandfields.com.

About the Experts

The Beautypedia Team proudly and unequivocally maintains the commitment that Paula Begoun, founder of Beautypedia and Paula's Choice Skincare made over 30 years ago-to help you find the best products possible for your skin. We do this by relentlessly pursuing and relying on published scientific research so you will have unbiased information on what works and what doesn't-and the sneaky ways you could be making your skin worse, not better!


The Beautypedia Team reviews all products using the same research, criteria, and objectivity, whether the product being reviewed is from Paula's Choice or another brand.

Member Comments
Summary of Member Comments
Results
Value
Recommend
WRITE A COMMENT
Sort by:
Page:
03.16.2015
Love this!

I love this tanner! So many other products.

Value
Results
Recommend
Reviewed by
Aaron
03.16.2015
Love it!

I love this product! It goes on evenly, dries quickly, no stinky smell, and gives a nice color.

Recommend
Results
Value
Reviewed by
Anonymous
WRITE A COMMENT
Enter a title for your review
 
First Name, Last Initial
Optional
Email Address
 
How would you rate this product on the following:
Results
Value
Recommend
     
     
     
Review
500 characters left
 
SUBMIT
CANCEL

Terms of Use

585633-IIS5 v1.0.0.389 4/25/2015 3:56:11 AM