12.17.2014
1
26
Moisture Surge CC Cream Compact Hydrating Colour Corrector Broad Spectrum SPF 25
Rating
$35
Category:Makeup > Tinted Moisturizers/BB Creams > CC Cream
Last Updated:12.17.2014
Jar Packaging:No
Tested on animals:Yes
Review Overview

First off, if you're wondering how CC creams are different from BB creams, here's the scoop: It's all about marketing language, nothing more. Generally, a BB cream from U.S. cosmetics brands is basically a tinted moisturizer, while a CC cream is more like a liquid foundation, but not always (in this case it's a creamy compact). They typically provide sun protection and may or may not include beneficial ingredients like antioxidants or skin-lightening agents. Neither BB nor CC creams are as revolutionary as they are made out to be, and there is little consistency among BB and CC's from different brands.

So how does this CC cream perform? To start, the name is a little misleading. The creamy texture blends on evenly enough, but sets to a powder-like finish that feels more matte than hydrating (you won't be getting a "surge" of moisture). Although this marketed to dry skin types it's best for normal to slightly dry or slightly oily (read: combination) skin.

In terms of beneficial ingredients, the fragrance-free formula has some antioxidants and skin- repairing ingredients. Not an abundant amount, but every little bit helps. The best thing this will do for your skin is provide broad spectrum sun protection. As for "colour correcting" properties, it provides medium coverage to and hide imperfections.

The shade range is hit or miss; each of the shades with "Light" as part of their name have pink or peach undertones that are less than flattering, but the other shades are fine and cater all the way to deep skin tones.

All in all, this isn't a bad CC cream, but not an amazing one either. See our Best CC Creams list for superior options.

Pros:
  • Fragrance-free formula with some antioxidants and skin-repairing ingredients.
  • Medium coverage to hide imperfections.
  • Provides broad spectrum sun protection as anti-aging benefit.
  • Creamy texture blends on evenly.
Cons:
  • Not as moisturizing as it claims to be.
  • The lighter shades have unflattering undertones.
Claims
Ingredients

Active: Octinoxate (5.5%), Titanium Dioxide (4.7%). Other: Isotridecyl Isononanoate, Dimethicone, Squalane, Dextrin Palmitate, Dimethicone/Vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer, Vinyl Dimethicone/Methicone Silsesquioxane Crosspolymer, Talc, Phytosteryl/Octyldodecyl Lauroyl Glutamate, Sorbitan Sesquiisostearate, Alumina, Glycerin, Salicylic Acid, Silica Dimethyl Silylate, Tocopherol, Sodium Hyaluronate, Nylon-12, Methyl Methacrylate Crosspolymer, HDI/Trimethylol Hexyllactone Crosspolymer, Stearic Acid, Triethoxycaprylylsilane, Silica, Magnesium Myristate, Tin Oxide, Dehydroacetic Acid. May Contain: Titanium Dioxide, Mica, Iron Oxides.

Brand Overview

Clinique At-A-Glance

Strengths: One of the best selections of state-of-the-art moisturizers and serums loaded with ingredients that research has shown are of great benefit to skin; excellent sunscreens; several Redness Solutions products excel; an outstanding benzoyl peroxide product; good selection of self-tanning products; some very good cleansers and eye makeup removers; some unique mattifying products; a large and wholly impressive selection of foundations, many with reliable sun protection (and shades for darker skin tones); good concealers; some remarkable mascaras; much-improved eyeshadows; loose powder; blush products; some brilliant lipsticks and lip gloss; gel eyeliner; priced lower than most competing department-store lines.

Weaknesses: The three-step skincare routine, because of the bar soaps and irritant-laden clarifying lotions; jar packaging downgrades several otherwise top-notch moisturizers; incomplete routines for those prone to acne; skin-lightening products with either unproven or insufficient levels of lightening agents.

Estee Lauder-owned Clinique's tremendous success (the company's products are sold in over 13,000 department stores and in 110 countries) reshaped the way cosmetics lines identified themselves, sending the concept of line loyalty out to pasture. Today, cosmetics companies expand their market either by buying already established companies or by creating new ones, and Lauder has been adept at doing both. Of course, cosmetics companies keep this multiple-personality identity hidden from the consumer. If the general buying public realized that these apparently different companies were so intertwined with each other, how could they flaunt their independence and claim that their unparalleled formulations are secret or the best? It's hard to think Lauder (or any company) would, even if they could, keep secrets from one branch separate from the others. And as evidenced by the formulary similarities between brands, they don't!

The niche Clinique built launched the concept of cosmetics being "allergy-tested," "hypoallergenic," "100% fragrance-free," and "dermatologist tested." Of those marketing claims the only one with significance is "100% fragrance-free," which, for the most part, Clinique maintains (although it does add some fragrant extracts to a few products). Regarding allergy testing, unless you can see the results, what difference does it make if a product makes that claim? What if the test showed 20% of the women who used it had a sensitizing reaction, dryness, or irritation? Would Clinique highlight this, or is it just easier to default to the generic allergy-tested claim and leave such details out, figuring consumers won't ask for more? 

Moreover, "hypoallergenic" is a term not regulated by the FDA, so any product can use the word without having to substantiate the claim. "Dermatologist tested" is also bogus, because without published test results the term can easily mean nothing more than that a dermatologist picked up the product, looked at the container, and said "This looks good." And what about the dermatologists on Clinique's payroll? How do we know they're not the ones involved in testing, rather than sending the products out for independent, impartial evaluation (though how impartial can any study be that's paid for by the company making the product)?

Clinique declined any participation for this site, which included refusing to send us copies of the allergy studies they maintain have been performed for every product they sell. We find their unwillingness to help odd because, for the most part, we genuinely like most of their products. In fact, more than any other department-store line except Estee Lauder, Clinique is leading the way with cutting-edge, state-of-the-art moisturizers and serums, plus some formidable makeup. They also have their act together for sunscreens and have expanded their decades-old three-step skin-care routine to include water-soluble cleansers instead of bar soap. They also now have a second "Dramatically Different" moisturizer that's well-suited for those with normal to oily skin and FINALLY reformulated their longstanding water-and-wax yellow lotion.

The Clinique consultants, dressed in medical-looking white lab coats (Clinique's image in that sense was ahead of the times given today's plethora of doctor-designed skin-care lines), do their best to speak intelligently about skin-care routines, but for the most part they're trained to sell the products rather than to provide information about what substantiated research has shown about the skin's needs to look and feel its best.

The good news for you is that the chemists behind Clinique's arsenal of products have been keeping up on this exciting information, and formulating superior products in response. We wouldn't blindly and solely bank on Clinique as your skin-care solution, but more than ever what they offer is, despite some far-out claims and problematic products, what epitomizes advanced skin care for all ages. Shop carefully and you'll leave confident that you are purchasing products with solid science, not just marketing hype, behind them.

Turning to makeup, Clinique continues to offer a vast palette of colors and textures, especially in their huge and imposing selection of foundations, many of which feature effective sunscreens. In fact, this category has become the most compelling reason to shop Clinique's makeup collection. Without a doubt the numerous formulas offer something for every skin type and almost every skin color. The shade selection has improved considerably, with more neutrals and a broader range than ever before. You still need to use caution and watch out for peach-toned duds, but for the most part finding a natural-looking match shouldn't be a frustrating experience, and the counter personnel are happy to provide samples.

Although the foundation and powder shades take darker skin tones into account, the blush, eye pencil, and most of the lipstick shades do not. Perhaps that will change in the future, as Clinique beautifully updated their eyeshadow collection with ultra-smooth textures and deeper colors that show up on darker skin.

Compliments are also due for Clinique's updated makeup tester units. They are well-organized, labeled with product name and price, and easily accessible without a salesperson's help. And speaking of salespeople, most of the Clinique consultants we encounter go above and beyond to provide assistance and to answer any questions we had (even if we didn't always agree with their responses). Those white lab coats don't mean medical expertise, but we'll take outstanding customer service over pseudoscience any day!

The bottom line is that, despite a few shortcomings, Clinique is one of the most comprehensive (and comparably affordable) department-store makeup lines, and it is completely understandable why they enjoy such broad appeal.

Note: Clinique is categorized as one that tests on animals because their products are sold in China. Although Clinique does not conduct animal testing for their products sold elsewhere, the Chinese government requires imported cosmetics be tested on animals, so foreign companies retailing there must comply. This requirement is why some brand’s state that they don’t test on animals “unless required by law”. Animal rights organizations consider cosmetic companies retailed in China to be brands that test on animals, and so does the Beautypedia Team.

For more information about Clinique, call (800) 419-4041 or visit www.clinique.com

About the Experts

The Beautypedia Team proudly and unequivocally maintains the commitment that Paula Begoun, founder of Beautypedia and Paula's Choice Skincare made over 30 years ago-to help you find the best products possible for your skin. We do this by relentlessly pursuing and relying on published scientific research so you will have unbiased information on what works and what doesn't-and the sneaky ways you could be making your skin worse, not better!


The Beautypedia Team reviews all products using the same research, criteria, and objectivity, whether the product being reviewed is from Paula's Choice or another brand.

Member Comments
Summary of Member Comments
Results
Value
Recommend
WRITE A COMMENT
Sort by:
Page:
11.17.2014
Creamy smooth yet oil free

Switched to this compact after looking for something with moisture over my Clinique redness solutions foundation. I have rosacea and seb. Dermatitis so my skin is oily and dehydrated with flakiness. I'm also super prone to breakouts all over my face but Clinique usually doesn't bother me since it excludes fragrance. So far so good with this compact! It's creamy smooth for the fall/winter yet oil free. Not a fan of the rectangular compact but it works fine. The coverage is great, medium coverage.

Results
Recommend
Value
Reviewed by
Cheryl L.
WRITE A COMMENT
Enter a title for your review
 
First Name, Last Initial
Optional
Email Address
 
How would you rate this product on the following:
Results
Value
Recommend
     
     
     
Review
500 characters left
 
SUBMIT
CANCEL

Terms of Use

585631-IIS3 v1.0.0.389 4/27/2015 12:05:28 PM