Tanning Salons Promote Wrinkling & Skin Cancer
Our Experts Recommend
Love Being Tan? Think Again and Save Your Skin!
Without question, there is no such thing as a safe tan from the sun or tanning beds. ALL tanning other than from a self-tanner is a problem. Whether you tan a little or a lot, skin turning any shade that is darker than your natural skin color is hazardous to your health and for all intents and purposes is virtually identical to the carcinogenic effect of smoking a cigarette. Over time, the damage is certain and will be staring you right in your face.
Friends Don’t Let Friends Use Tanning Beds
Indoor tanning salons are a multi-billion dollar global industry people use because they believe it makes them look more beautiful. But beyond the financial investment, the cost to your skin’s long term health and appearance is staggering.
Tanning beds radiate the most damaging effects of the sun only inches away from your body. Even more distressing is that most people who go to tanning salons do so repeatedly and expose parts of their bodies that would normally not see the sun. Tanning beds are a surefire way to put your skin on the fast track to wrinkles, discolorations, and yes, even skin cancer—facts any dermatologist will tell you because they see the dark side of tanning bed use every day.
Tanning Bed Facts and Controversies
- Dozens of studies have shown that people who use tanning beds have significantly higher rates of skin cancer than people who don’t use them.
- Aside from skin cancer there is a 100% certainty that you will have prematurely aged skin from repeated use of tanning beds.
- It is not unusual for women in their 20s who frequent tanning beds to develop advanced signs of aging most women won’t see until they’re well into their 40s—talk about a wake-up call!
Indoor tanning salons work vigorously to dispel notions of any link to this health issue. Shockingly, the owners of these salons actually promote false health benefits of their machines. One such deception is that tanning beds increase the body’s production of key nutrient vitamin D. Nothing could be further from the truth. In reality, tanning beds emit almost entirely UVA rays, but it is the sun’s UVB rays that help your body produce vitamin D! Learn more about sun exposure and vitamin D.
According to the FDA, the FCC (Federal Communications Commission), the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD), the Skin Cancer Foundation, and many other medical and regulatory sources worldwide, tanning beds are nothing more than skin cancer beds, and should be made illegal. The research for this is nothing less than startling.
If you’re using or thinking of using a tanning bed, the Paula's Choice Research Team strongly urges you to reconsider. You may not see the damage now, but you will eventually—and it isn’t pretty. For the mothers out there whose teen daughters are asking to use tanning beds, please show them this article; if that doesn’t help, point out all of the young celebrities who embrace their pale skin and wouldn’t dream of tanning!
(Sources: Michigan Law Review, November 2008, pages 365–390; Pigment Cell and Melanoma Research, October 2008, pages 509–516; Sources: British Journal of Dermatology, June 2008, pages 128–133; Dermatological Surgery, April 2008, pages 460–474; Photochemistry and Photobiology, March-April 2008, pages 528–536; Free Radical Biology and Medicine, March 2008, pages 990–1000; International Journal of Dermatology, December 2007, pages 1253–1257; Skin Research and Technology, November 2007, pages 360–368; British Journal of Dermatology, July 2007, pages 215–216; Pigment Cell Research, August 2006, pages 303–314; Photochemistry and Photobiology Science, May 2006, pages 160–164; Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, December 2005, pages 1038–1044; Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, December 2005, pages 2302–2307; Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, and Prevention, March 2005, pages 562–566; World Health Organization publication Tanning Sunbeds, Risk and Guidance; 2003; Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, August 2003, pages 371–375; Journal of the National Cancer Institute, February 2002, page 155; and Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, May 2001, pages 775–780.)
Back to top